Skip to main content

Enough to give you the Blues

They call him 'The Guv'nor': the Swiss Ramble who blogs from Zurich on football finances. This time he deploys his forensic skills and ability to read a set of accounts to consider the case of Birmingham City (2018/19 figures), enough to give anyone the blues. Their fans have been put through the wringer and they now face the prospect of another points deduction.

The Swiss Ramble notes, 'As a result of their fancy financial footwork [a stadium sale], the Blues £8m loss was nowhere near the worst reported in the Championship. Very few clubs manage to make money in this extremely competitive division, though largest losses often from promoted clubs – including hefty promotion bonuses.'

The club sold their stadium for £23m, which produced a £17m gain (deduct £7m book value, add £1m release of capital grant). If this transaction were excluded, they would have reported a large £26m loss. Interestingly, it was a much lower sale price than Rams £81m and Owls £60m.

It looks like newly registered company Birmingham City Stadium Ltd now owns the St.Andrews, though this is only an accounting transaction with no cash received. The ground will be leased back to the football club for 25 years at an annual rent of £1.25m.

Birmingham City have consistently lost money, only reporting a profit once in the last seven seasons – and that was just £1m in 2014/15. In the last three years, the club has accumulated £62m of losses – or £79m if the stadium sale is excluded.

The only season that Blues reported a big profit recently was £16m in 2012, very largely due to £22m of player sales. They have only made £23m from player trading in the seven years since then, but it will be a much higher figure in 2020 following Che Adams’ £15m move to Southampton. The Swiss Ramble notes, 'In fairness, clubs traditionally don’t make big money from player trading in the Championship, though 2018/19 has seen Bristol City and Stoke City generate £38m and £18m respectively.'

It's not all gloom. Following last season’s £4.2m (22%) increase, club revenue has now grown for three consecutive years. The 2019 £23.3m revenue is now higher than the £21.0m reported in 2015 – the last year when they received a parachute payment. Mainly driven by commercial income more than doubling.

Commercial income rose 57% (£3.7m) to £10.2m, largely due to owners Trillion Trophy paying 'significant' naming rights for the St Andrews stadium and Wast Hills training facility. Up to seventh highest in the Championship, though still less than half Leeds United £22m.

Moreover, 'Of course, it’s difficult to compete with clubs receiving Premier League parachute payments. In 2018/19, Stoke City, Swansea City and WBA received £43m, while Hull City, Middlesbrough and Sunderland got £34m, QPR £17m and Aston Villa £15m.'

A shout out for the fans: 'Despite their many issues, Blues have now seen their attendance rise 5 years in a row from the 15,457 low point in 2013/14, which reflects very well on their supporters. In fact, the 22,483 attendance last season was the highest since they were last in the Premier League in 2011.'

The wage bill fell £5.8m (15%) from £38.6m to £32.8m, though the prior season was inflated by severance payments for departing managers. Despite the reduction, this is still more than twice as much as £15.3m wages just three years ago in 2015/16. Playing staff down from 107 to 92. Following the decrease, the £33m wage bill is now only mid-table in the Championship, a long way below the likes of Aston Villa £73m, Stoke City £56m and Fulham £54m (all with parachute payments) and Norwich City £51m (including promotion bonus).

Gross debt increased by £24m from £73m to £97m, all owed to the club’s parent company BSHL (not repayable in next 12 months). Debt has grown by a worrying £81m in the last three years.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/