I have a number of friends who are Spurs fans and I have been telling them for some time, think about structure not agency. Modern football is obsessed with the manager or coach as if he actually controls the players on the pitch. Tottenham Hotspur have a splendid stadium (a relative who was a contractor is full of praise) but they seem to have forgotten that this is a means to the key objective of success on the pitch. Spurs, as one senior figure recently publicly admitted, are a football club who haven’t focused enough on the football. They’re a name, a brand, a venue, an events company. But not primarily a football team. It’s not Igor Tudor’s fault. You don’t blame the erroneously hired admin manager when the FTSE 100 company goes bankrupt. Spurs are just not a serious enough football club. Well, they’re a serious football club when it comes to aesthetics. Their stunning stadium is one of the finest in Europe, their state-of-the-art training ground is the same, th...
Despite record revenue, Nottingham Forest made an operating loss of nearly £65 m in 2024/25, after posting a £24 m profit the previous year: https://www.nottinghampost.com/sport/football/football-news/nottingham-forest-finances-revealed It's not unusual for insurgent Premier League clubs to make big losses as they try to compete with the big six or seven. Should Forest be relegated, they would face financial challenges.