Skip to main content

Cost pressures grow at Watford

The authoritative Swiss Ramble has taken an in depth look at the recently published accounts of Watford FC. The club made a pre-tax loss of £32m, compared to a £4m profit in the prior year, despite revenue rising 3% (£4m) to a record £128m, as profit on player sales fell from £22m to £3m. The £32m loss before tax is the highest of the ten Premier League clubs that have to date. The books would have been balanced if the Richarlison sale to Everton had gone through earlier.

This is first time Watford have lost money since returning to the top flight, having made £4m in both previous two seasons. Previously, they tended to make (small) losses. However, rather than indicating an underlying problem, it shows the influence that player sales can have on the bottom line.

The £4m revenue growth was mainly due to £3m (3%) increase in TV to £109m (Premier League distributions) while commercial rose £1.3m (13%) to £11.4m and match day was up £0.4m (5%) to £8.0m. Revenue has grown by an incredible £110m since promotion to the top flight in 2015 from £18m to £128m. Virtually all of this growth (£104m) has come from broadcasting with only small increases in commercial and match day (£3m apiece).

A hefty 85% of the club's revenue comes from TV, but this is far from unusual in the Premier League with many clubs heavily reliant on this revenue stream. In fact, in 2016/17 half of the clubs were above 80%.

Average attendance fell slightly from 20,571 to 20,231. Crowds are around 4,000 (20%) higher in the Premier League than the Championship. Attendance of 20,231 is still just about the lowest in the Premier League, only ahead of Bournemouth. £11m commercial revenue is still one of the smallest in the Premier League, around the same level as WBA, Swansea City and Brighton.

The wage bill rose 13% (£10m) from £76m to £86m, with player salaries increasing by £7.7m, while headcount was up from 254 to 292 (mainly players 13, coaches 13, ground staff 12). Wages to turnover ratio worsened from 61% to 67%. Wages have quadrupled since promotion.

Gross debt rose from £50m to £84m, with loans from group companies increasing from £45m to £80m. Debt has shot up £71m from just £13m since promotion to the Premier League. £84m. gross debt is now the 9th largest in the Premier League. What is worth noting is the high interest charged on Watford parent company loans, e.g. £55m at base rate + 6.28%; £20m at 5%. This resulted in £3.3m cash interest payments in 2018, the 6th highest in the Premier League, with a further £3m unpaid.

According to press reports, owner Gino Pozzo received a £125m offer last year from American media company, Prolific Media Holdings, for a 37.5% share, which would value the club at around £350m. Although this was rejected, there may be owner interest in selling a minority stake.

CEO Scott Duxbury noted that “costs associated with running a successful business within the PL” would continue to grow steadily. This will place pressure on the owners, as their loans would also have to increase – unless the club makes more profitable player sales.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/