Skip to main content

Happier times at Hull

Things have certainly changed at Hull City, since Acun Ilıcalı purchased the club from the Allamsvia his company Acun Media Group in January 2022. Since then, the Turkish businessman’s ambition has been evident and was again highlighted in the January transfer window, when City brought in no fewer than seven new players to strengthen the Tigers’ promotion bid.

They paid seven-figure sums to sign Abdülkadir Ömür from Trabzonspor and Ivor Pandur from Fortuna Sittard, while taking experienced striker Billy Sharp from Los Angeles Galaxy on a free transfer.

However, it was three of the four loan deals that really grabbed the attention, as these were from clubs in the Premier League: Fabio Carvalho from Liverpool, Anass Zaroury from Burnley and Ryan Giles from Luton Town.

Even though City’s outlay on permanent transfers in the January window was only around £4m, this was still one of the highest in the Championship, only bettered by Coventry City, Huddersfield Town and Stoke City.

Ilıcalı would appear to have restored the club’s relationship with its fans after ending the Allams’ controversial regime. The former owners wryly observed that “There have been a lot of ups and downs over the last 11 years or so”, which was one way of putting it.

While the club reached the Premier League under their control, spending a total of three seasons in the top flight, they also dropped down to League One during their tenure.

Spending on the squad had effectively dried up, but the new owner is cut from a different cloth, so has been happy to put money into the club and splash the cash (relatively speaking).

Hull City swung from a £13.9m pre-tax profit to a £5.2m loss in 2022/23, though this was entirely due to the previous season benefiting from a £20m write-down of a loan from the Allams following the sale of the club.

Otherwise, revenue rose £2.7m (18%) from £15.4m to £18.1m, though this was wiped out (and then some) by significant growth in operating expenses, which increased £15.4m (66%) to £38.7m, leading to a large £20.6m operating loss.

However, this was largely offset by £15.2m profit from player sales, up £12.9m from the prior year’s £2.3m.

All three revenue streams were higher, though the largest growth was in commercial, which nearly doubled from £2.1m to £3.9m. Broadcasting increased £0.5m (7%) from £7.7m to £8.2m, while match day was up £0.4m (6%) from £5.6m to £6.0m.

Even though they lost £5.2m, City still have the second best financial result in the Championship in 2022/23 to date, only behind Watford’s £24m profit. All the other clubs have also posted a loss, ranging from Middlesbrough £6.4m to Norwich City £27.2m.

It is worth emphasising that City’s relatively small net loss was only made possible by £15.2m profit from player sales, which was nearly seven times as much as the previous season’s £2.3m. This was very largely due to the big money sale of Keane Lewis-Potter to Brentford, where the profit was enhanced by the fact that he was an academy product, so carried no cost in the books. This is the third highest profit from player trading to date in 2022/23, only surpassed by Watford’s £59.2m and Middlesbrough’s £22.3m.

If we exclude the exceptional £20m gain from the loan write-off, City have now lost money three years in a row. This is in marked contrast to the preceding period, where the Allams’ tight-fisted/sustainable approach (delete as appropriate) led to the club posting profits six years out of seven.

Unsurprisingly, the largest profit of £36m came the last time that City were in the Premier League in 2016/17, though more investment would have given the club a better chance of staying up, so maybe this was a false economy.

In the six years since relegation from the Premier League, Hull City’s revenue has dropped by very nearly £100m (85%) from £117m to £18m. The decrease is mainly driven by broadcasting £86m, but there was also a steep decline in match day £10m, while commercial was £3m lower.

On the other hand, revenue is more than twice as much as the £7m they earned in League One. In addition, this is the club’s highest revenue outside the Premier League in a season without parachute payments.

Attendances recover

City’s attendances had slumped from around 24,000 in the Premier League in 2013/14 to less than 10,000 in the Championship, driven by unhappiness with the former owners, as many fans boycotted matches.  However, there has been a strong recovery under the new ownership to 17,973 in 2022/23, helped by the club applying what Ilıcalı described as “crazy” discounts.

City’s wage bill shot up by £11.0m (86%) from £12.7m to £23.7m, reflecting the new owner’s investment in the squad, as headcount increased from 189 to 225. It’s worth noting that this increase has basically only reversed the cuts in the last three years, while wages have dropped by £38m (61%) since dropping out of the top flight.

In the six years since relegation from the Premier League, most of City’s funding has come from £49m net player sales, while another £21m has been taken from cash reserves.   The Allams initially provided a lot of funding to Hull City, but the last time that they put money into the club was 2015, followed by some repayments of their loans.  In a classic game of two halves, they provided £78m in the five years between 2011 and 2015, while £37m was repaid to them in the four years between 2018 and 2022.

The finances are still far from perfect, but to be fair any club in the Championship that does not benefit from parachute payments will struggle to break-even. In such a situation, it is almost inevitable that owners will have to gamble a little, though spending does not guarantee success in this incredibly competitive division.

Even after a lot of investment by Ilıcalı, Hull City are still a fair way behind many better resourced Championship clubs in terms of revenue, wages and transfer spend, but at least they have given themselves a better chance than the past few years.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/