Skip to main content

Newcastle interested in multi-club model

Amanda Staveley made some interesting comments at a meeting in Jeddah last Thursday.

The consortium containing Staveley, the Reuben family and Saudi’s Public Investment Fund (PIF) purchased Newcastle from UK businessman Mike Ashley for £305million ($389.5m) in October 2021.

Although she would not confirm so when asked, Staveley implied that the club are likely to be worth significantly more than that already, given their greater on-field success since, increased profile; and, moreover, the fact that fellow leading Premier League sides Manchester United and Chelsea have been valued at several billion pounds each over the past two years.

The price the consortium paid for Newcastle was, according to Staveley, around twice the club’s annual turnover at the time, whereas most Premier League outfits are sold for several times more than that percentage.

“The only thing I’ll say about valuation is, in particular, we — PIF, myself and my husband, and the Reuben family — bought the club well — at less than two times turnover,” she said. “Most clubs at the top of the league, you’ve seen valuations between five and seven times turnover. We look at things in a more measured way.

“We still look at a valuation not just in terms of turnover, but we use multi-variant models which look at profitability and that’s critical — especially with the environment we’re moving into.”

Interestingly, despite her suggestion that PSR should be reformed, Staveley also believes that the existence of FFP regulations has made English clubs far more attractive to U.S. owners and asset managers.

Staveley managed to convince PIF to take an 80 per cent stake in Newcastle through a clear and thought-out business plan. However, given that Newcastle were winless that season when the takeover went through in the October and facing relegation, more than £100million was spent in the transfer market in January 2022 to try to make sure they didn’t go down.

For the financier, there was a need to oversee “dramatic change” in a short space of time to revive the club and ensure they remained a Premier League side, even if she admits it deviated from the initial stringent financial blueprint.

“Pretty fast,” Staveley said, when asked how long it took for the business plan to be “thrown out”. “When you go in, you have all the hype of trying to acquire the club and it took us four years to do that.

“So you need to know that we’re patient and we were persistent, but there needed to be dramatic change… We had to take this incredible club and inject it with some life.”

Staveley described Howe as an “incredible coach” who was a “very important” hire in the process of turning the club’s fortunes around.

Summer plans

A summer of upheaval is expected at Newcastle, with several incomings and outgoings likely, and early plans are already in place — though Staveley would not reveal them.

“I’m not sure. You’ll have to come back and see a little bit — see how we do the next few months,” Staveley said, when asked if Newcastle will be involved in any “big transfers” this summer. When pushed that her response “sounds like a yes”, she added: “Oh, I don’t know. I’m not sure what we’ll be doing on transfers at the moment.”

Multi-club model

There has been an expectation since the consortium acquired Newcastle that they would be the first of multiple clubs within a wider sporting organisation. More than half of the 20 current English top-flight sides have relationships with at least one overseas side.

The consortium has explored markets across the world — including discussions with clubs in Belgium and France — but Newcastle do not so far have any partnerships in the way that Manchester City do via the City Football Group. Staveley insisted Newcastle remain interested in pursuing that avenue in the future.

“I think we are very much (interested in a multi-club model),” Staveley said. “Multi-clubs are part of having football, it’s a real benefit to be able to have players and train players that aren’t part of your squad.

“The UEFA rules are changing and so we have to see what emerges. Obviously, the dynamics around whether we could have a club have changed quite dramatically over the last year. I’m still a very big fan of the multi-club model, a lot of other competitors and friends in the Premier League have multi-club relationships, but it has to be considered as a whole.

“We’ve looked at Belgium, we’ve looked at a lot of European markets, we’ve looked in Asia, Australia, we’ve looked in Brazil — pretty much everything. We’ve looked at every market and getting players through our academy system and through that multi-club model would be very helpful in terms of allowing us to buy and have players as part of our journey earlier on.”

Getting involved in Saudi

Again, with the discussion taking place in Jeddah, the discussion returned to the Saudi Pro League and whether Staveley would be keen to purchase a stake in a club in that country, given the vast investment being ploughed into its top division.

“I think that’ll be a lovely idea,” she said with a smile. “It’d be a fantastic opportunity to take a space in a Saudi club. I love the league and I’ve seen it develop. It’s really exciting to see the competition really growing over here as well.”

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/