Skip to main content

Everton could face further points deduction

Everton face the possibility of another points deduction next season after the independent commission dealing with their profitability and sustainability case could not decide on whether costs of £6.5 million related to a further breach.

The scenario raises the prospect of a contentious end to the Premier League season should Sean Dyche’s side maintain their top-flight status by a small margin.

Everton slipped to 16th place, two places above the relegation zone, after being docked two points for admitting breaking spending rules by £16.6 million for the three-year period up to June 2023. The club believed the biggest penalty they should have received was losing a single point and wanted it to be deferred until next season. They now plan to appeal and that will have to be heard before the end of the campaign to affect the league table.

The Premier League alleged the overall breach was just more than £23 million. However, it emerged that they remain at loggerheads with Everton over the capitalisation of £6,561,000 and that the complexity of the issue meant the commission could not deal with the matter in the time frame set out.

The club say the costs are interest payments associated with the construction of their new stadium at Bramley-Moore Dock and are therefore not losses, while the league considers that the costs should come under calculation for their Profitability and Sustainability Rules.

The deduction of two points in the latest case has been downscaled. The starting point of any breach is three points, and the size of the breach — £16.6 million — incurred two more points, the commission said.

However, the commission then stated that the club should be entitled to mitigation, accepting the double jeopardy argument that they had already been penalised because of the overlap in three-year periods.

That reduced the tally by two points, while the loss of sponsorship due to the Ukraine war and Everton’s mea culpa reduced it by a further point.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/