Skip to main content

Globalisation versus regulation in top flight football

As I argued in my book Political Football globalisation may have halted in other sectors of the economy, but it is still flourishing in football.   Prestige plays as important a part as financial gain (which doesn't happen that often, at least for clubs and their owners: agents and other internediaries are anoher issue, as are the players).   

Will La Liga or the Premier League be the first to stage an official league match in the US?   This is the latest challenge to traditional formats to emerge once again.

The Times has a long article today from the chief executive of the Premier League warning against government plans to create a regulatory framework and hoping at least that the legislation might be delayed (although a Labour Government might be more resistant to Premier League lobbying).   His argument can be reduced to one sentence: don’t kill the goose that laid the golden egg.   He wants light touch regulation, but some of us remember how well that worked in financial services.

Football finance guru Kieran Maguire commented: 'I’ve read some blathering drivel in my time, but this from Richard Masters claiming football doesn’t need a regulator, yet members lost over £1bn last season, whose clubs can’t get accounts in on time & has inconsistent cost control rules, takes t’biscuit.'

Fifa and US promoter Relevent Sports have reached an agreement to end their legal fight over a ban on big European football leagues and clubs playing official matches in the US. Relevent and the world’s football governing body told the Manhattan federal court on Monday that they expect the agreement “will resolve the claims between them” in the litigation.

There is no guarantee that the resolution will result in European league games taking place in the US. But Relevent said in a statement to the Financial Times that Fifa was considering “changes to its existing rules about whether games can be played outside of a league’s home territory”.

The agency and match promoter, which is owned by billionaire Stephen Ross, had initially sued the US Soccer Federation, the national governing body, accusing it of conspiring to block foreign leagues from playing official season matches in the country. The lawsuit came in response to Relevent’s efforts in 2018 to organise a fixture in Miami between Spanish La Liga teams Barcelona and Girona. It also attempted to organise an Ecuadorean league match.

European football leagues and clubs are increasingly targeting US fans and consumers ahead of the 2026 Fifa World Cup, which will be co-hosted by Canada, Mexico and the US. Top clubs regularly hold friendlies and exhibitions in the US but are unable to play official season matches in the country.

Relevent has emerged as a crucial ally to European competition organisers as they expand their international reach and revenues. The sports agency has brokered billions of dollars in media rights deals for Uefa, which organises the elite Champions League, and La Liga. It also worked on the Premier League’s “Summer Series” pre-season friendlies last year.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/