Skip to main content

Excellent financial results at Milan

2023/24 was the second set of accounts reported for Milan under the ownership of US investment company RedBird Capital Partners, who purchased the club from Elliott Management in August 2022 in a €1.2bln deal that included a minority stake for Major League Baseball club, the New York Yankees.

RedBird already had some experience in the world of football via their controlling interest in French club Toulouse and an 11% stake in Fenway Sports Group, Liverpool’s owners.

Before and after the change in ownership, Milan have done pretty well on the pitch finishing in the top four in each of the last four seasons, including a league title in 2021/22.

Revenue growth

Milan posted a pre-tax profit for the second year in a row, though this fell slightly from €14m to €12m. Despite a poorer performance in the Champions League, revenue rose €9m (2%) from €400m to a new club record €409m.

Milan have set new club records for operating revenue four years in a row, so this has shot up by €180m (79%) from the pre-pandemic €228m to €409m, thanks to steep improvements in all revenue streams, especially commercial and match day, which have both more than doubled.

Milan had enjoyed the third highest revenue in the world back in 2003/04. At that time, they generated €83m more revenue than the 10th placed club, but in 2022/23 they were €147m lower, meaning a swing of a quarter of a billion Euros. That said, the gap was as high as €254m four years ago.

Milan’s revenue growth was driven by commercial, which rose €33m (23%) from €146m to €179m, while income from player loans was up 21% to €8m.  However, there were decreases in the other revenue streams, due to less progress in the Champions League. Broadcasting fell €23m (13%) from €175m to €152m, while match day was down €4m (5%) from €73m to €69m.

Milan have achieved a major turnaround in their finances, registering a profit for the second consecutive season.  In the previous ten years, they had lost around €900m, as chief executive Giorgio Furlani admitted, “Milan was not sustainable the way it is today, the club was on the verge of bankruptcy.”

It will be interesting to see whether Milan can again make a profit this season, as they have made little to date from player sales, though this could be offset by more money from the Champions League, depending on their progress.

It’s worth noting that Milan’s financial improvement has been achieved despite the adverse impact of COVID.  The authoritative Swiss Ramble estimates that the pandemic caused a €74m revenue loss, split between €27m in 2019/20 and €47m in 2020/21. This was made up of match day €47m, broadcasting €16m and commercial €11m.

Losses of the Italian big four

The big four Italian clubs established an unwanted reputation for suffering huge losses, which means that they lost a staggering €2.6 bln in the last five years. However, these have more than halved from €754m in 2020/21 to €313m last season, most of which came from Juventus’ €199m.

All these clubs have improved their bottom line, though Milan have been the star performers, as they are the only club that has managed to generate a profit in this period. If we look at the last three years, Milan’s net €56m loss is comfortably the best result, as the others have lost a lot more: Juventus €562m, Roma €399m and Inter €261m.

Player trading was clearly an area for improvement for Milan, as their €21m profit in the three years up to 2022/23 was one of the lowest in Italy, a long way behind the likes of Atalanta €181m, Inter €134m, Fiorentina €131m and Napoli €131m.

Milan’s 2023/24 profit would have been higher without €14m of exceptional costs relating to the dismissal of head coach Stefano Pioli and his technical staff. Over the last ten years, Milan have been hit by €92m of similar provisions, though 2021/22 benefited from an €18m gain on the sale of Casa Milan, the football club’s headquarters.

According to La Gazzetta dello Sport, Milan received €87m TV money from Serie A in 2023/24. Last season the algorithm applied a new factor based on the number of minutes played by young players.

The disadvantage that Italian clubs have in terms of broadcasting revenue was highlighted in the 2022/23 Money League, where no fewer than five leading clubs earned more than a quarter of a billion Euros, led by Manchester City €344m.  Milan were 14th highest, but this figure was boosted by reaching the Champions League semi-finals. Their more normal €152m last season would have placed them even lower in the rankings.

European earnings

Based on the Swiss Ramble’s model, Milan earned €53m TV money from Europe last season. They got €48m from the Champions League after finishing third in the group, then added another €5m after dropping down to the Europa League, where they reached the quarter-finals.

Milan’s financial recovery owes a lot to their return to the Champions League, as they have earned a hefty €184m in the last three seasons, averaging €61m a year, compared to just €45m in the previous seven years combined.

Indeed, they failed to qualify four times in the last decade (one year because of an FFP punishment), which had seriously damaged their finances. The last time that they had made more than €40m was back in 2012/13.

The €184m that Milan have received from Europe in the last three years is the second highest in Italy, only surpassed by Inter €230m, but better than Napoli €164m and Juventus €143m.

Stadium

The saga of Milan’s search for a new stadium rumbles on.  A few months ago, it seemed to be certain that the club would be focusing on a 70,000 seat new stadium in San Donato. Indeed, Furlani said, “We have thrown ourselves into that project. San Siro is no longer feasible.”

However, the Milan council has recently re-opened the project originally started in 2019 for a new stadium in the San Siro area. Although both Milan and Inter have formally expressed their interest, there is an understandable degree of caution.

The only thing that all parties would agree on is the recent comment by the mayor of Milan, Giuseppe Sala, “This is a long story, but it’s not easy to build a stadium in Italy.”

Milan’s gross financial debt increased by €28m from €71m to €99m, consisting entirely of factoring payables (Factorit €67m and Banca Ifis €32m), i.e. advances on future receivables, so they have no bank debt.  The amount owed has fallen from over €300m in 2009, though this was greatly helped by Elliott, who repaid the bonds and shareholder loans taken out under the previous Chinese ownership.

Even after last season’s increase, Milan’s €99m gross debt is only the seventh highest in Italy, miles below Roma €497m, Inter €427m and Juventus €279m.   Scaroni had noted that “the debt must always be kept under control”. Of course, if the stadium development does eventually take off, then debt will significantly increase.

Conclusion

Milan’s second year under the leadership of RedBird Capital continued on the same positive path as the previous season, with the club once again profitable, while setting another new revenue record in the process.

President Paolo Scaroni said, “Milan is a well-managed and healthy club”, which is fair comment, given these excellent financial results, though it should be noted that last season’s profit relied on player trading to offset the operating loss.

In fairness, Milan are clearly more focused on the cost base than years gone by, but qualification for the Champions League remains extremely important for their bottom line. This means that they need to continue to invest well in the squad to avoid any deterioration in sporting performance.

I have been to La Scala twice, but never to the San Siro!   A Milanese friend did investigate the possibility of having my book Political Football translated into Italian but without success.   Unfortunately, he had to go the post office and pay a customs fee for the copy I sent him because of Brexit!  Cheap copies available at https://www.abebooks.com



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Spurs to sell minority stake

Tottenham Hotspur is in talks to sell a minority stake in a deal that could value it at up to £3.75 billion and pave the way for Joe Lewis and his family to sever ties with the Premier League football club. Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy is seeking an investment that values the club at between £3.5 billion and £3.75 billion, including debt. While the terms of any deal have not been finalised, City sources expect Spurs to sell about 10 per cent. The club is being advised by bankers from Rothschild on the sale. Tottenham wants to raise fresh capital for new player signings and to help fund the development of an academy for its women’s team, as well as a 30-storey hotel next to its north London stadium. The financier Amanda Staveley, who brokered the deal for Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund to take over Newcastle United, is understood to be among the parties to have expressed an interest in Tottenham. Staveley’s fund, PCP Capital Partners, has raised about £500 million to depl