Skip to main content

Juve depend on player sales and Champions League

The authoritative Swiss Rambles reviews the accounts of Juventus. 2019/20 accounts cover a COVID impacted season when they won the league (for the 9th year in a row), but were eliminated in the Champions League last 16 by Lyon.

The loss before tax widened from €27m to €82m (€90m after tax), as revenue fell €88m (18%) from €494m to €407m, partly offset by €43m (13%) wages cut from €328m to €284m and profit on player sales rising €40m to €167m, though non cash flow expenses were up €48m.

So after four years of profits, the club have now reported losses three years in a row, aggregating a €119m deficit over that period. However, the club is no stranger to losses, having racked up €151m between 2011 and 2013. They forecast that 2020/21 will end in another loss.

The €234m is the worst operating loss in Italy. It is true that their accounts are the only ones impacted by COVID to date, but this had already been on a steady downward trend from €(1)m in 2015. The €142m loss in 2019 was the 3rd highest in the Money League top 20.

Image
Image

Driven by COVID, all revenue streams fell, including broadcasting, down €40m (19%) to €166m, and match day, down €21m (30%) to €49m. Commercial only fell €1m to €186m, as new sponsorships compensated for lower merchandising sales. Player loans down €25m to €5m.

The €82m loss before tax is 2nd highest in Italy, only surpassed by Milan’s €143m, though this is a bit misleading, as other clubs’ results are from the previous season, so unaffected by COVID.

The profit on player sales increased from €127m to €167m, the highest in Italy by far, largely from the sales of Pjanic to Barcelona, Cancelo to Manchester City, Kean to Everton, Can to Dortmund, Muratore to Atalanta and Mancuso to Empoli.

Profit on player sales is increasingly important for Juventus averaging €132m a year over last 4 years, compared to only €22m in the preceding six years. No major sales to date in 2020/21, though summer window runs to 5th October this season and January window still to come.

Excluding player sales, revenue fell €88m (18%) from €494m to €407m in 2020. Despite last season’s decrease, revenue has still grown by €56m (16%) in the last four years, almost entirely on the commercial side €83m, though broadcasting is down €29m.

The €407m revenue is highest in Italy, €37m more than closest challenger Inter €377m, followed by Roma €236m, Milan €228m, Napoli €217m, Atalanta €141m & Lazio €124m. All other Serie A clubs are below €100m. Gap will grow as others release COVID impacted accounts.

It is imperative that Juventus do well in the Champions League to boost their broadcasting income, as the TV rights in Serie A are relatively low. Indeed, there were big increases in England and Spain in 2019/20, and France to come in 2020/21, while Italy is unchanged.

The Swiss Ramble estimates that the club earned €87m from the Champions League after going out in the last 16, lower than prior season’s €96m, when they reached the quarter-finals. Worth noting the influence on Champions League money of the UEFA coefficient payment (based on performances over 10 years), where Juventus has the 6th highest ranking of clubs competing this season, guaranteeing them €30m.

The Champions League is extremely important for Juventus, who have earned an impressive €449m from Europe in last five seasons. Not only is this much higher than other Italian clubs (Roma €255m, Napoli €246m, Inter €117m), but best in Europe (next highest Real Madrid €418m).

Commercial income fell slightly (1%) to €186m, as new sponsorship deals, up €21m (19%) to €130m, offset reductions in merchandising and museum/stadium tours. Highest in Italy, €20m ahead of Inter €166m, then a big gap to Milan €76m, Roma €55m and Napoli €45m). Commercial growth linked to Ronaldo’s arrival, which Andrea Agnelli said, “brings us worldwide profile”.

The increase in sponsorship deals is vital if they want to financially compete with the leading clubs in Spain, England, Germany and France, as their commercial income is much higher, e.g. five clubs were well above €300m in the 2018/19 Money League.

The wage bill was cut by €43m (13%) from €328m to €284m, largely because players and coaching staff gave up four months’ salary (March to June) worth €90m. The implication is that without this gesture (due to the pandemic) wages would have risen €47m to €375m.

Despite this cut, wages have still grown by €63m (28%) since 2016. The only other Italian clubs that have grown by a similar amount are Inter €68m and Napoli €50m, though the wage bill of €284m is still significantly higher than the rest of Serie A. The closest challengers are around €100m lower: Inter €193m, Milan €185m and Roma €184m. Furthermore, they might also have cut in 2019/20 due to COVID pressures. They might have also reduced wages in the same way as Juve in 2019/20.

The wages to turnover ratio increased from 66% to 70%, the club’s highest since 2012 and right on UEFA’s recommended upper limit. This is mid-table in Italy. Of the bigger clubs, this is better than Milan 81% and Roma 78%, but worse than Napoli 62% and Inter 52%.
Image
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...
Post a Comment
Read more

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...
1 comment
Read more

A poor financial record, but new hope at Everton

I recently saw an amusing video online in which a group of Everton fans were rebuked in jest for being hopeful.  Football fans in general tend to swing between excessive optimism and excessive pessimism, but for many it seems that moaning is in their bloodstream (Spurs fans probably take the trophy).  However, Everton fans have had plenty to moan about on and off the pitch.   Let’s hope that a new era is about to begin for this grand old club. Everton’s 2023/24 financial results covered a fairly momentous season, when they ended up 15th in the Premier League, though they would finished three places higher if they had not received an 8-point deduction for breaching the Premier League’s Profitability and Sustainability Regulations (PSR). It was a worrying time for Everton fans, as the club faced a “perfect storm” of issues, including large financial losses, an ever increasing debt burden, a challenging stadium build and the tortuous sale of the club. There were eve...
Post a Comment
Read more