Skip to main content

Posts

Arsenal plan big stadium expansion

Arsenal are planning a major expansion of the Emirates that could force them to move their home matches temporarily to Wembley Stadium. Detailed work has gone into a potential overhaul of the north London stadium that would increase Arsenal’s current 60,700-capacity to beyond 70,000. It would restore the club’s standing as the biggest ground in London, overtaking West Ham United and rivals Tottenham Hotspur. It is understood the club have options to change the gradient of the stands and can also adapt the seating plan to fit in more fans. The outer bowl, however, would remain similar in appearance as the majority of developments being assessed would come inside the ground. Arsenal, though, will be well aware that Real Madrid doubled their matchday income following their recent upgrade to the Bernabéu, which generated €241m (£210m) in the most recent accounting year. Industry experts believe that a comparably steep year-on-year increase is feasible. Arsenal are restricted by...
Recent posts

New Milan stadium gets go ahead

Milan City Council passed a vote approving the sale of San Siro to Inter and Milan on Tuesday, which clears the path for the construction of a new stadium on the site.  The sale is expected to be ratified once due diligence has been completed at the beginning of November. Plans for a new stadium would see San Siro, which the two rival clubs share as their home ground, mostly demolished, with only 10 per cent of the existing structure of the stadium expected to remain. There is currently no indication of where the two sides will play while the new site is being worked on. Milan have played at San Siro since 1926 and it has been shared with Inter since 1947. In 2019, both clubs announced plans to build a new 60,000-seat stadium, though the project stalled due to political opposition and Italy’s heritage regulations, which safeguard historic structures. In September 2023, Milan announced plans to construct a new 70,000-capacity stadium in the south-eastern area of the city in an...

How much have managerial sackings cost United?

Manchester United have more than footballing reasons to bear in mind when considering whether or not to bring the Amorim experiment to an abrupt end. Sacking managers/head coaches costs money and, at United, financial concerns have been a prominent topic since Sir Jim Ratcliffe acquired a stake in the club in February 2024. For almost 27 years from the late 1980s, United didn’t need to worry about what changing their manager would cost. Sir Alex Ferguson’s lengthy and wildly successful time in charge ensured any problems tended to reside away from the Old Trafford dugout. Much has changed since his 2013 retirement. Amorim is that dugout’s sixth permanent occupant in the subsequent 12 years. All that flux comes at a price. Ferguson’s own departure, while plainly not a sacking, brought about £2.4million ($3.2m at the current rate) in costs to remove coaching staff not wanted by his successor, David Moyes. Just 10 months into a six-year deal, Moyes was out by the following April. Remo...

Still a long way to go before Juventus break even

Juventus’ 2024/25 accounts cover a season when they finished fourth in Serie A, thus qualifying for the Champions League, but only thanks to an away win against Venezia on the last day of the season. Coming fourth was not too bad, but Juventus have struggled by their own lofty standards in the last five years, given that they had won the league no fewer than nine seasons in a row before that. Juventus’ pre-tax loss significantly reduced from €196m to €50m, as revenue rose €68m (18%) from €372m to €440m and profit from player sales almost quadrupled from €23m to €90m. Although the substantial reduction in the pre-tax loss is obviously good news, the fact is that Juventus still lost €50m before tax, which is hardly small change.   Looking at the latest published results, which are a mixture of the 2023/24 and 2024/25 seasons, Juve’s loss was still one of the worst in Serie A, only smaller than Roma €76m, Parma €64m and Monza €54m. In the three years up to 2023/24, the “Old Lady” ...

Wednesday staff not paid on time again

The Sheffield Wednesday chairman Dejphon Chansiri has come in for fresh criticism after some staff and players were told once again that they would not be paid in full on their scheduled payday on Tuesday. Employees were told in an email on Monday that, for the fifth time in the past seven months, they would not receive their full salaries on time. The Times understands that the majority of the first-team squad will not be paid their full monthly wage. Staff on the non-football side of the operation have been told that they will receive about £1,000, while academy players and scholars will be paid in full.   The payment of such a small amount to non-football staff will leave many of them scrambling to pay their bills, which has caused consternation within the club and among fans, many of whom have been protesting against Chansiri’s ownership for some time. Fifa rules state that if a club do not pay a player on time twice, he or she can rip up their contract unless the cl...

How PSR hits Villa

The authoritative Swiss Ramble examines Aston Villa’s troubles with PSR.   Here is a summary of his main points. Villa were the one Premier League club whose transfer window this summer was very clearly impacted by PSR, as noted by manager Unai Emery,   Villa actually had the lowest gross spend in the top flight this summer with just £42m, which was miles below the likes of Liverpool £459m, Chelsea £331m and Arsenal £291m.   For even more perspective, this was also a lot less than the three promoted clubs: Sunderland £193m, Burnley £135m and Leeds United £116m. Villa’s financial challenges directly led to the sale of Jacob Ramsey to Newcastle United for £39m, which was a “pure profit” deal, as he is an Academy product.    However, it’s fair to say that Villa would have been willing to sell more players, e.g. both Emi Martinez and Ollie Watkins seemed destined to leave at various stages of the transfer window, though other clubs would have low-balled the...

United may have to modify stadium plans

Manchester United have had plans drawn up for a new Old Trafford where the canopy that caused such a stir when unveiled earlier this year is removed.  The club are looking at alternatives to the bold design presented in March by co-owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe and architect Sir Norman Foster, due to issues over purchasing the required land. Talks have been held with Freightliner, the company that owns much of the area to the west of the current ground, which had been earmarked for part of the new stadium footprint and some 17,000 homes. But Freightliner is demanding around £400million ($535m) for the land, according to sources familiar with proceedings who spoke on the condition of anonymity, substantially higher than United’s projected price in the region of £50m, as first reported by The Guardian. The company is willing to relocate the freight terminal to a new site but is so far holding out for a major windfall. Amid the impasse, United are considering different optio...