Skip to main content

Are United 'trading off their history'?

Ed Woodward, Manchester United’s former executive vice-chair, claimed to analysts in 2018 that the team’s “playing performance doesn’t really have a meaningful impact on what we can do on the commercial side of the business”. United’s ongoing struggles on the pitch since then are bringing that assertion into question.

After increasing its commercial revenues by a total of just 10 per cent over the past six seasons, the club has been leapfrogged by its two biggest rivals, Manchester City and Liverpool, which between them have won nine out of the previous 12 Premier League titles since United’s last triumph in 2013. Even after a 15th-place finish last year, and a failure to qualify for the lucrative Champions League, United’s commercial revenues remain commensurate with the most successful clubs in world football.

 Andy Green, finance director at Manchester United Supporters Trust and head of investment at private equity firm Rockpool Investments, warned the Financial Times that the club was “trading off its history”. As a new Premier League season gets under way, observers like Green believe the club now needs to deliver meaningful improvements on the pitch to stand a chance of reclaiming the ground lost off it. In 2023-24, United generated £302mn of commercial revenue, compared with £308mn and £349mn at Liverpool and Man City respectively. Arsenal, Man City, Chelsea, Liverpool and Tottenham Hotspur have all increased their commercial revenues at a greater pace than United has managed since 2019, albeit from a lower base.

 In 2024, petrochemicals billionaire Sir Jim Ratcliffe paid $1.6bn for a 29 per cent stake in United in a deal that handed him control of its sporting operations. Despite its travails, Ratcliffe is confident in the United brand. “It stands shoulder to shoulder with Coca-Cola and Apple,” he said at the opening of the club’s recently upgraded training facilities, a £50mn project overseen by architect Sir Norman Foster. The redesigned complex features an underwater treadmill and a “high altitude” exercise room with adjustable heat and humidity.

United has spent more than €2bn signing players since Sir Alex Ferguson retired as manager in 2013, after leading the club for more than two decades as it dominated English football. Its net spend, which takes account of income from player sales, is €1.7bn since Ferguson’s departure, the highest of any Premier League club, according to data website Transfermarkt.

After overseeing a deeply unpopular period of cost-cutting — including scrapping free staff lunches, cutting bonuses and culling 450 jobs — Ratcliffe has sanctioned yet more spending on player transfers. So far this summer the outlay comes to about £200mn, spent on three attacking players: Matheus Cunha, Bryan Mbeumo and Benjamin Šeško. Only defending champions Liverpool and Chelsea have spent more, according to Transfermarkt.

United continues to be able to attract blue-chip sponsors. Qualcomm’s Snapdragon brand last year extended its $75mn-a-year front-of-shirt sponsorship deal until 2029. In 2023, Adidas agreed a 10-year kit deal worth about £900mn, though £10mn will be deducted this season owing to United’s failure to qualify for the Champions League.

The club’s commercial revenue totalled £245.1mn in the nine months to March 31, up 5.8 per cent on the same period a year earlier. “It’s tough, right, but we’re committed to this thing. And so we’re going to work through it and we’re going to be supportive of the club,” Don McGuire, chief marketing officer at Qualcomm told the :Pink ‘Un. “Obviously performance on the pitch helps,” he added. “I believe they’re going to get there and I am super happy with some of the moves they’ve already made”.

Green, the finance director of the supporters trust, believes there’s “no silver bullet” to increase revenues at the sort of rates seen in the Woodward era. United’s commercial income almost quadrupled to nearly £200mn in the decade to 2015. People close to the club say a new stadium, which could cost at least £2bn, is key to opening up new commercial revenue streams, including sponsorship deals.

But with construction yet to even begin, the more immediate opportunities to reaccelerate commercial revenue growth lie in qualification for the Champions League. With only domestic football to worry about this season, Ratcliffe and co-owners the Glazers are betting that new signings can improve performances under manager Ruben Amorim, who was appointed last November.

Green cautioned that the recent transfer spend was not without risk. “The risk they’re taking essentially is that it doesn’t pay off,” he said. “That profitability doesn’t materially improve because they can’t get back in the Champions League, that revenue doesn’t improve and they build up more transfer debt that needs to be settled over the next three or four years.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Hull City's 'strange' loan

When football finance guru Kieran Maguire seems flashing lights in a club's loan deal, I become concerned.  He is the leading football finance expert in the UK. Hull City have borrowed £55m against their stadium and training ground yet they should get £30m from the Premier League before long.  What is going on? https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cpwel48y51do

Reports about Charlton sale exaggerated

Reports have appeared in The Guardian and elsewhere that Charlton has been put up for sale. Richard Cawley is an authoritative local journalist who runs a South London Sport substack site.  He reached out to the club yesterday evening to ask for comment on The Guardian’s article. Early indications from the club have been that nothing has changed since the story about them seeking investment, except that it is now a different company doing it. Charlton have since managed to consolidate their place in the Championship, avoiding an instant return to League One, with their women’s side promoted to the WSL, returning to the top flight for the first time since 2007, although staying there is likely to be costly. It would be counter-intuitive for owners Global Football Partners not to progress the club when looking for investment, that the focus remains on driving it forward, that their spend this summer is in line with long-term planning and will see an increase in wages spent on players...