Skip to main content

Are United 'trading off their history'?

Ed Woodward, Manchester United’s former executive vice-chair, claimed to analysts in 2018 that the team’s “playing performance doesn’t really have a meaningful impact on what we can do on the commercial side of the business”. United’s ongoing struggles on the pitch since then are bringing that assertion into question.

After increasing its commercial revenues by a total of just 10 per cent over the past six seasons, the club has been leapfrogged by its two biggest rivals, Manchester City and Liverpool, which between them have won nine out of the previous 12 Premier League titles since United’s last triumph in 2013. Even after a 15th-place finish last year, and a failure to qualify for the lucrative Champions League, United’s commercial revenues remain commensurate with the most successful clubs in world football.

 Andy Green, finance director at Manchester United Supporters Trust and head of investment at private equity firm Rockpool Investments, warned the Financial Times that the club was “trading off its history”. As a new Premier League season gets under way, observers like Green believe the club now needs to deliver meaningful improvements on the pitch to stand a chance of reclaiming the ground lost off it. In 2023-24, United generated £302mn of commercial revenue, compared with £308mn and £349mn at Liverpool and Man City respectively. Arsenal, Man City, Chelsea, Liverpool and Tottenham Hotspur have all increased their commercial revenues at a greater pace than United has managed since 2019, albeit from a lower base.

 In 2024, petrochemicals billionaire Sir Jim Ratcliffe paid $1.6bn for a 29 per cent stake in United in a deal that handed him control of its sporting operations. Despite its travails, Ratcliffe is confident in the United brand. “It stands shoulder to shoulder with Coca-Cola and Apple,” he said at the opening of the club’s recently upgraded training facilities, a £50mn project overseen by architect Sir Norman Foster. The redesigned complex features an underwater treadmill and a “high altitude” exercise room with adjustable heat and humidity.

United has spent more than €2bn signing players since Sir Alex Ferguson retired as manager in 2013, after leading the club for more than two decades as it dominated English football. Its net spend, which takes account of income from player sales, is €1.7bn since Ferguson’s departure, the highest of any Premier League club, according to data website Transfermarkt.

After overseeing a deeply unpopular period of cost-cutting — including scrapping free staff lunches, cutting bonuses and culling 450 jobs — Ratcliffe has sanctioned yet more spending on player transfers. So far this summer the outlay comes to about £200mn, spent on three attacking players: Matheus Cunha, Bryan Mbeumo and Benjamin Šeško. Only defending champions Liverpool and Chelsea have spent more, according to Transfermarkt.

United continues to be able to attract blue-chip sponsors. Qualcomm’s Snapdragon brand last year extended its $75mn-a-year front-of-shirt sponsorship deal until 2029. In 2023, Adidas agreed a 10-year kit deal worth about £900mn, though £10mn will be deducted this season owing to United’s failure to qualify for the Champions League.

The club’s commercial revenue totalled £245.1mn in the nine months to March 31, up 5.8 per cent on the same period a year earlier. “It’s tough, right, but we’re committed to this thing. And so we’re going to work through it and we’re going to be supportive of the club,” Don McGuire, chief marketing officer at Qualcomm told the :Pink ‘Un. “Obviously performance on the pitch helps,” he added. “I believe they’re going to get there and I am super happy with some of the moves they’ve already made”.

Green, the finance director of the supporters trust, believes there’s “no silver bullet” to increase revenues at the sort of rates seen in the Woodward era. United’s commercial income almost quadrupled to nearly £200mn in the decade to 2015. People close to the club say a new stadium, which could cost at least £2bn, is key to opening up new commercial revenue streams, including sponsorship deals.

But with construction yet to even begin, the more immediate opportunities to reaccelerate commercial revenue growth lie in qualification for the Champions League. With only domestic football to worry about this season, Ratcliffe and co-owners the Glazers are betting that new signings can improve performances under manager Ruben Amorim, who was appointed last November.

Green cautioned that the recent transfer spend was not without risk. “The risk they’re taking essentially is that it doesn’t pay off,” he said. “That profitability doesn’t materially improve because they can’t get back in the Champions League, that revenue doesn’t improve and they build up more transfer debt that needs to be settled over the next three or four years.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...

A poor financial record, but new hope at Everton

I recently saw an amusing video online in which a group of Everton fans were rebuked in jest for being hopeful.  Football fans in general tend to swing between excessive optimism and excessive pessimism, but for many it seems that moaning is in their bloodstream (Spurs fans probably take the trophy).  However, Everton fans have had plenty to moan about on and off the pitch.   Let’s hope that a new era is about to begin for this grand old club. Everton’s 2023/24 financial results covered a fairly momentous season, when they ended up 15th in the Premier League, though they would finished three places higher if they had not received an 8-point deduction for breaching the Premier League’s Profitability and Sustainability Regulations (PSR). It was a worrying time for Everton fans, as the club faced a “perfect storm” of issues, including large financial losses, an ever increasing debt burden, a challenging stadium build and the tortuous sale of the club. There were eve...