Skip to main content

Manchester City have most financial muscle in world football

Manchester City have more financial muscle than any other club in world football – according to the Soccerex Football Finance 100. The study underlines how the global football landscape has changed dramatically over the past two decades, largely due to increased investor interest from billionaires across Europe, Asia Pacific, the Middle East and the Americas and escalating broadcast revenue. Manchester City topping the Soccerex Football Finance 100 will come as little surprise, being one of the most prominent cases of significant foreign investment transforming a club’s status and potential.

This new annual report by Soccerex uses a bespoke methodology to evaluate and rank the top 100 clubs across the planet based on their finances. Manchester City topped the global rankings with a Football Finance Index (FFI) score of 4.883, which factors in five variables – playing assets, fixed assets, money in the bank, potential owner investment and net debt. Potential owner investment presumably involves a subjective judgement, whilst the other variables are more readily measureable. The methodology used can affect the results obtained (see the discussion of Chelsea below). As always with such studies, a note of caution is needed, but there are some interesting findings and the study is very comprehensive in its coverage.

Paris Saint-Germain, who smashed the world transfer record to sign Brazilian superstar Neymar in August, are only third (4.128) – having unexpectedly been pipped to second place by Arsenal (4.559). UK clubs dominate the top ten, with fifth-placed Tottenham Hotspur (2.591) surprisingly ahead of both Manchester United in seventh (2.314) and Chelsea in ninth (2.073).

Reflecting China’s growing significance in the global market and their huge investment into football, Guangzhou Evergrande (3.423) are fourth while La Liga giants Real Madrid are sixth (2.579). Barcelona (13th, 1.626) don’t even make the top ten, which is completed by 33-time Serie A winners Juventus (eighth, 2.260) and Bundesliga powerhouse Bayern Munich (2.086). Liverpool are 16th (1.370).

Arsenal's lofty position reflects what worries the club's fans

Arsenal’s lofty position – especially being ahead of PSG – will raise eyebrows due to the criticism the club faces from some quarters for a perceived lack of spending in the transfer market. The Soccerex Football Finance 100 explains the North London club’s ranking is a reflection of their sound business model, which sees them near the top in four of the five key variables while also having relatively low net debt. The study adds: 'This position of financial strength means Arsenal could invest significantly should the hierarchy at the club choose to change their business strategy.' Fans no doubt would welcome such a change of direction.

The study finds the owners of the top 100 ranked clubs have a combined net worth of just over €475bn. The owners of the nine largest clubs in China have a net worth of €75.1bn and the financial potential of the Chinese Super League is underlined by nine of its clubs populating the top 100 – level with Spain and more than France, Germany and Italy.

The US is the second most-represented country in the top 30 with five teams, spearheaded by LA Galaxy in 14th. This is largely due to solid business models, high-value assets and strong investment.

It is a different story in South America. Despite its rich football heritage, the region is a notable absentee in the top 30 as national economic instability is reflected in its financial position. Brazil, however, has 12 clubs ranked between 50 &100.

The UK dominates the upper echelons of the rankings, with eight teams in the top 30 – three more than any other nation – but Chelsea being positioned as low as ninth may surprise some given Roman Abramovich’s heavy investment. The Stamford Bridge club’s ranking is affected by their listing of the owner’s investment as a loan, albeit one without interest or timescale, which gives them the largest net debt in the top 100. This shows how the results of studies of this kind can be influenced by the methodology used. An adjustment has been made for this in Chelsea’s ranking but if the bulk of their ‘debt’ to Abramovich was recorded as sponsorship or something similar, as it is with other clubs, the Blues would rank higher.

Is Spain beginning to wane?

The Spanish giants usually dominate football finance reports so why are Real Madrid and Barcelona ‘languishing’ in sixth and 13th respectively? Their rankings are impacted by member ownership structures and the lack of potential owner investment (very subjective as noted above). However, the study points out that should Real Madrid be capitalised via the stock markets, their overall financial power would make them worth more than any tycoon’s club.

The report also shows the increasing impact of foreign ownership on La Liga, with Atletico Madrid in 15th following the recent investment of Wanda Group, the Chinese conglomerate, while Valencia, backed by the wealth of Singapore businessman Peter Lim, also make the top 30.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...

A poor financial record, but new hope at Everton

I recently saw an amusing video online in which a group of Everton fans were rebuked in jest for being hopeful.  Football fans in general tend to swing between excessive optimism and excessive pessimism, but for many it seems that moaning is in their bloodstream (Spurs fans probably take the trophy).  However, Everton fans have had plenty to moan about on and off the pitch.   Let’s hope that a new era is about to begin for this grand old club. Everton’s 2023/24 financial results covered a fairly momentous season, when they ended up 15th in the Premier League, though they would finished three places higher if they had not received an 8-point deduction for breaching the Premier League’s Profitability and Sustainability Regulations (PSR). It was a worrying time for Everton fans, as the club faced a “perfect storm” of issues, including large financial losses, an ever increasing debt burden, a challenging stadium build and the tortuous sale of the club. There were eve...