Skip to main content

Who will benefit from Wembley Stadium bid?

Billionaire owner of Fulham Football Club Shahid Khan has made what is effectively a £900m bid for Wembley Stadium which is to become a home for both British and American football. The 'Tash with the Cash' as he is nicknamed made his fortune selling car parts in the United States and also owns the Jacksonville Jaguars NFL team.

Who will benefit from the deal? The Football Association will have £500m up front and will also receive some £400m in income from the rights to Club Wembley over the next six years. The £58m it raised from this source in 2016/17 just about covers the stadium operating costs. It will also save substantial investments over the next few years which Mr Kahn claims are necessary to 'refresh' the stadium. 'Wembley's new, but it's not that new,' he says. A sum of around £60m is being talked about.

The Football Association will be able to use the money to create a special fund to build artificial pitches and other grass roots facilities. However, some commentators are sceptical about how much of the money would find its money into the grass roots game. There is still £140m of debt to be repaid.

The stadium cost nearly £800m to complete. That's £987m in current money, so a £900m sale represents a loss, although one should take account of the avoidance of future expenditure and the £12m a year it costs to service the debt. Substantial sums are still owed to public bodies: £78m to Sport England, £18.5m to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport and £16.2m to the Greater London Authority.

The Jacksonville Jaguars will play a number of games at Wembley between September and December which will lead to England games 'going on the road' outside London. There could ultimately be a NFL franchise in London. Spurs do not see this as a threat to stage NFL games at their new stadium for which it has been configured, although there will only be one such game next season.

Fixture congestion could pose problems for Chelsea's plan to play home games at Wembley while Stamford Bridge is redeveloped, but careful planning should find a way round this. There will be a certain irony in Chelsea playing at a stadium owned by Fulham's owner.

Some hope that the move will lead the FA to relocate from London to the Midlands, but there is scant hope of that.

Ken Bates has been fulminating about selling our heritage and has called on the Government to intervene, but they have indicated that they are disinclined to do so. The Wembley name will be protected by a covenant, although it is not clear whether this would cover the sale of naming rights.

Kieran Maguire reckons that the biggest winners since Wembley was built have been the banks. He notes, 'The FA have been charged £331.5 million in loan syndication and interest fees.'

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/