Skip to main content

Digital revolution changes football's relationship with television

I am always suspicious of stories that claim that 'the Premiership bubble is about to burst'. They usually reflect the tall poppy syndrome, a resentment of success. Whilst it is true that domestic television revenues have plateaued, those from overseas continue to increase.

However, there may be some real changes taking place. Karl Marx was wrong about many things, and his disciples got things even more wrong, but he had one important insight, the way in which technology drove change. In a sense, Saint-Simon had already had that insight, but he believed that science and technology would solve everything, a view which is certainly still widely held.

Just as satellite broadcasting made the riches of the Premier League possible, so digital technology provides a new set of challenges. It could well lead to a totally free market system in which more power is restored to the consumer, rather than the sofa fan being at the mercy of Sky and other providers.

As it is, as someone told The Times, 'The reality is that any person with a reasonable grasp of computers can access a pirate stream of any Premier League match, kicking off at any time.'

In addition all midweek Championship matches can be watched via Sky on the red button and club matches from League One and League Two can be seen on the iFollow service. On Tuesday, should I take a five hour round trip to London to watch Charlton play Oxford United, get home at 12.30pm, and pay £23.45 for a rail ticket when I could watch the game on my own laptop?

Now the EFL is a battle with Eleven Sports about showing live La Liga and Serie A matches during the Saturday afternoon blackout period. They have won the battle, as Eleven Sports have stopped screening La Liga matches, but they have probably lost the war.

Eleven Sports are almost certain to mount a legal challenge. As Martyn Ziegler commented in The Times yesterday, 'Effectively, now that Eleven Sports has a paper trail from the FA to Uefa to the Spanish FA and La Liga, it can mount a legal challenge'. I am not a lawyer, but my hunch is the blackout is a breach of competition law.

Ziegler commented, 'The fear has always been that a free market in TV would lead to a drop in attendances, which would affect the atmosphere, which would make the matches less attractive to broadcasters, which would mean less money from TV contracts'. The England v. Croatia match is an exemplar of what a match without a crowd can be like. But one could boost crowds by reducing admission prices, although that would affect another income stream.

Live TV coverage hits Championship crowds

An investigation by The Times found that attendance at midweek games in the Championship have fallen significantly since all matches were made available to watch live on television. Of course, midweek attendances are always lower than those at weekend matches. People cannot get away from work in time even for a home game and an away game may mean returning in the early hours of the morning. Cold or wet weather can also put fans off.

The normal drop in attendance would be about 4.5 per cent for a midweek game (I suspect the fall off may be greater in the lower leagues) but this season they have fallen by an average of 8.8 per cent (from 20,590 to 18,777).

The deal with Sky is worth £88m a year, rising to £120m annually from 2019 to 2024. This has to be shared with 72 clubs and contrasts with the bottom club in the Premier League earning a minimum of £100m from TV rights each season.

Each Championship club receives a £2.325m basic award of television money, £4.6m in solidarity payments from the Premier League, plus an additional £100,000 in facility fees for each home live match to cover any loss of gate revenues (£120k for Sunday games and £140k for Thursday night games). Away teams received £10,000 each time they appeared on TV

The Times did look at League One and League Two games to see if there had been any impact from live streaming on two Saturdays when it was allowed at 3pm because of the international break. The results were inconclusive, especially as attendances might have been boosted by supporters who might otherwise have gone to games in the top two divisions.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/