Skip to main content

Gap between the Big Six and the rest is growing

There is much talk about the so-called 'Big Six' pulling away from the rest of the Premier League financially, but is this actually true asks the authoritative Swiss Ramble? Note that in this analysis the seventh placed club as measured by revenue and wages is not always the same from one season to another.

The gap between the club with the 6th highest revenue (Tottenham Hostpur £379m) and 7th highest (Everton £189m) shot up to £190m in 2018, compared to £73m in 2017 (though this would have been higher without Leicester City's £70m Champions League money). Back in 2010 the gap was only £29m.

One reason for the growing gap between sixth and seventh highest revenue clubs is investment in new stadia, which has increased match day revenue at Spurs from £37m to £76m, while this has actually fallen at the 7th placed club from £24m to £16m.

The equitable Premier League TV deal means there has been relatively little change in the gap between sixth and seventh highest revenue clubs in terms of broadcasting income, though even here this has grown by £17m since 2010. From 2019/20 the new distribution model for overseas deals will further increase the gap. In contrast, the gap between sixth and seventh highest revenue clubs for European TV money (Champions League and Europa League) has risen by £42m since 2010. In particular, Tottenham Hotspur's European revenue rose from £5m to £54m in last 3 years. New UEFA deals are likely to accelerate this trend.

The good news for the seventh placed club is that commercial income has doubled from £14m to £30m since 2010, but the bad news is that this revenue stream has more than tripled at the sixth placed club from £32m to £103m, which means the gap has widened from £17m to £73m in this period.

In summary, the 2018 gap between the sixth and seventh highest revenue clubs in the Premier League of £190m comes from all revenue streams, led by commercial £73m and match day £59m. The £58m difference in broadcasting is dominated by European competitions £42m with only £17m domestic.

However, in contrast to revenue, the gap between the sixth and seventh highest wages clubs in the Premier League has actually fallen in the last 4 years to just £2m (Spurs £148m vs. Everton £145m), partly due to Short Term Cost Controls (financial fair play), which restricted wages growth. The relative parsimony of Tottenham Hotspur is also a factor and the gap between the fifth and seventh placed clubs has grown, although it has narrowed in the last two years.

The Swiss Ramble concludes, 'To sum up, the revenue gap between the Big Six and the rest of the league continues to grow apace. While the story appear to be not quite so clear-cut in wages and transfer spend, it is much the same if we exclude low spending Tottenham Hotspur from the comparison.'

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Spurs to sell minority stake

Tottenham Hotspur is in talks to sell a minority stake in a deal that could value it at up to £3.75 billion and pave the way for Joe Lewis and his family to sever ties with the Premier League football club. Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy is seeking an investment that values the club at between £3.5 billion and £3.75 billion, including debt. While the terms of any deal have not been finalised, City sources expect Spurs to sell about 10 per cent. The club is being advised by bankers from Rothschild on the sale. Tottenham wants to raise fresh capital for new player signings and to help fund the development of an academy for its women’s team, as well as a 30-storey hotel next to its north London stadium. The financier Amanda Staveley, who brokered the deal for Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund to take over Newcastle United, is understood to be among the parties to have expressed an interest in Tottenham. Staveley’s fund, PCP Capital Partners, has raised about £500 million to depl