Skip to main content

The Bury saga

There is nothing surprising about a lower league club encountering financial problems. The 20 clubs in the Premier League made operating profits of £900m before transfers in the 2017/18 season. The 72 clubs in the EFL made combined losses of £411m in the same period.

Being a club in the Manchester conurbation with its two top Premier League sides is not easy. Bury have been in financial trouble before. In 2002 I remember being one of many football fans who donated £10 in return for having my name put on a seat.

However, clearly there has been mismanagement in the case of Bury. The Financial Times has described it as 'a case of speculative property finance intruding on the world of lower division football where simply running a team rarely provides returns.'

Previous owner Stewart Day was the sole director of a company called Mederco Ltd. It entered into leases on the car park that the club owned on the Gigg Lane stadium. The spaces were then subleased to retail investors for £9,995 each, with the company offering buyers returns of 9 per cent for five years. According to an administrator of Mederco, the payments are about £190,000 in arrears. Other property schemes connected to Mederco, such as student accommodation development, have collapsed into administration.

In December last year Mr Day sold the club to Stewart Dale for £1. He had had a career in the building trade, mainly through equipment hire. He did not even know that Bury had a football club.

Kieran Maguire of the PriceofFootball has commented: '11 days later [Dale] set up two new companies, Bury Heritage and Bury Leisure and started transferring assets to them, including the club’s trophies. Some would describe this as the action of a sociopathic asset stripper.'

Last month Bury put forward a Company Voluntary Arrangement to settle its outstanding debts. Non-football creditors would be paid just a quarter of the £4m they were owed.

This happened over the objections of some of the largest creditors including HM Revenue and Customs. The main creditors were Mr Dale and RCR Holdings, an Oldham registered company founded just days before the CVA meeting. As the largest shareholders, they had voting rights that overrode other creditors' objections. Mr Dale has declined to comment on reports that RCR Holdings is connected to members of his family.

The Insolvency Practitioners Association has announced that it is going to investigate the CVA: Investigation

C & N Sporting Risk pulled out of an offer to buy the club earlier this week. One issue was a mortgage attached to Gigg Lane taken out by Mr Day worth £3.7m. This was reportedly accruing interest at £1,500 a day. This was a heavy burden for a club that made a loss of £2.8m in the year to May 2017.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/