Skip to main content

Premier League and FA in battle over new visa rules for players

The FA and the Premier League are engaged in a battle over what happens over player visas after Brexit is completed at the end of the year. Many fans would like to see more English players being developed in the Premier League and EFL, while the Premier League is concerned that the global attraction of its offer is dependent on attracting some of the best world class players. The Premier League is increasingly reliant on overseas television revenues as domestic revenues have plateaued.

After the Brexit transition ends those coming from the EU can be expected to be treated in the same way as players coming from other parts of the world. According to an analysis by the Financial Times more than half the players at Arsenal, Chelsea, Manchester City, Norwich and Wolverhampton Wanderers are EU nationals.

Under the current rules homegrown players are counted as those registered with the FA for at least three years before they are 21 years old, regardless of nationality. That has allowed top English clubs to scoop up some of the best European players aged between 16 and 19. That rule is expected to change with only players from the four home countries being treated as home grown.

European players will then be expected to meet the same criteria as non-EU nationals to gain a work permit such as regularly playing for their national team. Of course, some players in the EFL from outside the EU play for their national team. It just so happens that the national team is well down the international pecking order, for example relatively small Caribbean countries. An extreme case is the the volcano ravaged British Overseas Territory of Montserrat has a population of under 6,000. Many of its inhabitants emigrated to England, including footballers.

The Football Association thinks that it has a great opportunity to reduce the number of foreign players at clubs. It wants to reduce the maximum number of non home grown players in each squad of 25 to be reduced from 17 to 12. This has led to a major bust up with the Premier League. In an effort to reach a settlement, the FA has offered to loosen the criteria for all overseas players to gain work permits in England. This could open the door for less established players from South America.

The Premier League is confident that the FA will back down on its more stringent demands. It is increasingly recognised that changes could have unintended and perverse consequences. It is believed that the Big Six would scoop up promising players from other Premier League clubs for bench warming or loan duties which might not aid their development. Top sports lawyer Daniel Geey told the Pink 'Un that elite clubs would respond to restrictive quotas by paying huge transfer prices to acquire the best English talent and hoard it in their squads.

Work permit rules are set by the Home Office in consultation with the FA. The final decision might thus rest with smirking Home Secretary Prite Patel who is keen to restrict immigration despite her own heritage.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/