Skip to main content

Will a new Scottish football format benefit the few rather than the many?

Quite what is going to happen in Scottish football when it resumes is far from resolved.  As always, particular clubs are pursuing their own narrow interests.

Former Inverness Caledonian Thistle manager Craig Brewster is surely right when he says that finances will dictate the format adopted: https://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/fp/sport/football/inverness-caledonian-thistle/2222282/brewster-says-finances-will-dictate-proposal-to-expand-premiership/

He reckons calls for a 14-team Premiership will only succeed if the proposal is financially viable for the league’s leading clubs.  Hearts are desperate to push through an expanded top-flight in order to avoid relegation to the Championship, while the proposal would also see Inverness promoted as second-tier runners-up.

The Scottish Supporters' Network has commented: 'In the absence of Scottish football action, countless column inches and Zoom call minutes have been taken up with planning for an eventual return, and the league configurations that could possibly make that happen.

At the heart of this are the objectives of protecting supporter, player and staff welfare; ensuring sporting integrity and fairness; and minimising financial stress on our clubs. Early in this process it was clear that there were no perfect solutions and no easy answers, and that trade-offs and compromises would be needed. Everyone who cared about Scottish football would need to come together to find a way through the crisis, and it was in this spirit that we offered to take part in the league reconstruction task force. Ultimately that offer was not accepted, and it was disappointing to see this challenge undertaken by the SPFL clubs alone.

In the absence of full involvement in the process, we offered input in the form of a high-level survey, asking Scottish football supporters what they liked and disliked about the current league structure, and what changes they wished to see this summer.

Survey Findings

The current structure is viewed positively, but there is clear and strong support for larger divisions – although not at the expense of the current competitiveness. The play-offs are broadly seen as positive, but there is scope for improvement – to ensure fairness, and to remove the current bias in favour of teams from higher divisions. The premiership split is also seen as broadly positive, although the imbalance in home and away fixtures is of great concern. The pyramid has been well received, and there is support for opening this up further.

The financial distribution model is a major concern for fans, relegation can put clubs in crisis and easier transitions between the divisions are needed. We have also seen a lot of criticism towards the SPFL’s voting mechanism and decision-making processes, with suspicion that the current reconstruction discussions are taking place to benefit the few rather than the many.'

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/