Skip to main content

Bristol City have a very generous benefactor

The authoritative and tireless Swiss Ramble has tweeted from Zurich on the 2019/20 accounts of Bristol City.  [I should add that I am client of Hargreaves Lansdown].

The Swiss Ramble states: 'Like most Championship clubs, Bristol City make operational losses, though they have limited the damage with profitable player trading. This revenue source is under pressure (as are others) in the current pandemic, so they are lucky to have a benevolent owner in [Steve] Lansdown.'

The Swiss Ramble estimates that Lansdown 'has put in around £203m to date (capital £133m, loan £70m) with little sign of the need for this funding going.' [He is the co-founder of Hargreaves Lansdown which is now a listed company].

[As at many clubs] 'Player trading has become increasingly important at the club with £78m profits in the last four years, compared to only £6m in preceding six years. As Lansdown said, this “is all part and parcel of the process” of making the club sustainable. That said, few sales were made last summer.'

Bristol City 'swung from £11m profit before tax to £10m loss, mainly due to profit on player sales falling £12m from £38m to £26m, while revenue dropped £3m (10%) from £30m to £27m and expenses rose £6m (10%) to £64m. After tax, £10m profit to £9m loss.' Accumulated losses over the decade are £104m.

The operating loss (i.e. excluding player sales and interest payable) widened from £26m to £35m, as revenue fell, but expenses increased. This is surely the club’s worst financial performance ever, only offset by the lucrative player sales.

The club's £27m revenue is still only 10th highest in the Championship, significantly below some of the clubs benefiting from parachute payments [which create an unlevel playing field].

The club splashed out £26m on player purchases, one of the highest in the Championship, including Kalas, Palmer and Dasilva (Chelsea), Massengo (Monaco), Wells (Burnley), Bentley (Brentford) and Nagy (Bologna). More than £22m total expenditure in the previous two seasons.

The wage bill rose £2.8m (9%) to £33.5m, a club record, despite players agreeing to defer a percentage of their wages for three months due to COVID. This means that wages have nearly doubled (up £16m) since the first season after promotion from League One in 2016.

Most Championship clubs operate at a significant loss, due to very high wages to turnover ratios, as they compete for promotion to the “promised land” of the Premier League. That said, Bristol City's £35m operating loss was firmly in the bottom half of the table.

The wages to turnover ratio increased from 101% to 123%, which is not great, but this is pretty much par for the course in this ultra-competitive division, where 16 clubs are above 100%, much worse than UEFA’s recommended 70% upper limit.

Gross debt of £73m is quite large for a club of their size, but a few other clubs in the Championship owe more. The debt is not an issue, so long as Steve Lansdown remains a friendly owner, as he demonstrated last year by converting £8.7m of debt to equity.

The club have no problems with Profitability & Sustainability rules. Reported £24m losses over three-year monitoring period less estimated £17m allowable deductions for academy, community, infrastructure and COVID take their FFP losses to £7m, easily within the £39m target.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/