Skip to main content

Blues consistently lose money

The authoritative Swiss Ramble has given his verdict on the 2019/20 accounts of Birmingham City.

The club's loss increased from £8.4m to £18.2m, as prior year included £17m profit on the sale of the stadium, partly offset by profit on player sales rising £7m to £12m. Revenue fell £0.5m (2%) from £23.3m to £22.8m, while expenses were flat overall.

The loss of £18m is firmly in the bottom half of the Championship, though many other clubs have posted higher losses, even before the pandemic. In 2019/20 these include Leeds United £62m, Reading £42m, Middlesbrough £36m and WBA £23m.

The Blues have consistently lost money, only reporting a profit once in the last eight years – and that was just £1m in 2015. Since then, the club has accumulated £85m of losses – or £102m if the stadium sale is exclude

Excluding property sales, only 2 Championship clubs are profitable in 2019/20 to date (Hull and Swansea, with £3m apiece). Very few clubs manage to make money in this ultra-competitive division, though largest losses are often from promoted clubs – including hefty promotion bonuses

The profit on player sales increased from £4.4m to £11.5m, largely from the transfer of Che Adams to Southampton. That was pretty good, but still a fair bit lower than Bristol City £26m, Brentford £25m and Hull City £23m.

The only year that the club reported a sizeable profit recently was £16m in 2012, due to £22m of player sales. 2020’s £12m is the first double-digit profit from this activity since then. but this season will be boosted by Jude Bellingham’s big money move to Borussia Dortmund.

Despite a small fall in 2020, the club have done well to grow revenue by £8.1m (55%) in the last four years. In fact, their £22.8m revenue is higher than the last year when they had a parachute payment in 2015. Highest growth came in commercial, which is the largest revenue stream (40%).    This partly due to owners Trillion Trophy naming rights for St Andrews stadium and training facility (deals expire in 2021).

The £23m revenue is mid-table in the Championship, significantly below those clubs in receipt of parachute payments following relegation from the Premier League, but also behind clubs like Bristol City £27m and Nottingham Forest £26m.

If parachute payments were excluded, the £23m would have the 9th highest revenue in the Championship. They would still be a fair way below the leading clubs, though the gap to the highest placed Leeds United would be reduced to “only” £31m.

The wage bill rose slightly (1%) from £32.8m to £33.1m, as playing staff increased from 92 to 99, while there were wage deferrals during football lockdown. This is more than twice as much as £15m four years ago in 2016. In the same period revenue has only grown £8m (55%).   The £33m wage bill is around mid-table in the Championship.

The wages to turnover ratio increased from 140% to 145%. This is far from ideal, but pretty much par for the course in the Championship, where 19 clubs are above 100%, much worse than UEFA’s recommended 70% upper limit. More than twice as much as 67% they reported in 2015.

Gross debt increased by £19m from £97m to £116m, almost entirely owed to the club’s parent company Birmingham Sports Holdings Limited. This means that the club’s debt has grown by a worrying £100m in the last 4 years.   Unsurprisingly, the £116m debt is one of the largest in the Championship, only behind Blackburn Rovers £142m and Stoke City £141m. The debt is not an issue – so long as the owners continue to provide support. It is unsecured and interest-free, though repayable on demand.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/