What is the situation with the Premier League's investigation into Manchester City's alleged breach of its profitability and sustainability rules?
In August 2019, the league issued a disciplinary complaint
against Manchester City and asked them to release documents; the club refused In October 2019, the league set up an
arbitration tribunal to enforce that request; the club challenged the
tribunal’s jurisdiction and impartiality.
In February 2020, the league changed its rules to ensure impartiality
and the tribunal restated the demand for disclosure
In June 2020, the tribunal rejected a fresh challenge from
the club, who then filed an arbitration claim at Companies Court. In July and November 2020, the tribunal
again rejected arguments from the club and issued a final demand for disclosure
but the order was stayed pending court proceedings
In March 2021, Justice Moulder rejected the club’s arguments
about the league tribunal, denied it permission to appeal and informed City she
intended to publish these decisions; she did, however, give City permission to
apply for an appeal on the publication issue, which City accepted. In April 2021, Lord Justice Males accepted
the appeal, and it was heard on June 30 by him, Sir John Flaux, the Chancellor
of the High Court, and Sir Geoffrey Vos, the Master of the Rolls. And on Tuesday, July 20, their rejection of
City’s appeal was published, along with Justice Moulder’s rulings from March.
As the judges pointed out, there really was very
little actual information about the state of the investigation in their
judgments, beyond City’s steadfast refusal to hand over documents, the league
accusing City’s procedural challenges as “tactical” (about which Justice
Moulder added she had not made any judgment) and a reference to City saying
publication would be detrimental as they were in talks over a commercial deal
earlier this year but that was no longer the case by late June.
What can be said is that the league should not run into
the same “time-barred” issues as UEFA, as it has no five-year rule, and it also
has the benefit of the additional emails Der Spiegel published after City were
cleared by CAS last summer.
Those emails appeared to add more weight to the suggestion
that City’s main sponsor, Etihad, was substantially reimbursed for its generous
support of the club by Sheikh Mansour. It is a suggestion the club has flatly
rejected and UEFA has not revisited.
It is also the case that the Premier League’s allowable
losses limit — £105 million over three years — is about four times as generous
as UEFA’s and City, once all the permitted deductions are made, might not break
that ceiling even if the most serious of Der Spiegel’s allegations are proven.
What is more likely is that City might eventually be charged
with a charge akin to misleading the league or simply failing to cooperate with
an FFP inquiry.
The corruption in football has been apparent for a long time, it isn't just clubs but top officials who become very rich. They sell their votes so Qatar can get the World Cup.
ReplyDeleteSeveral of Bayern Munich's top officials have been known to be corrupt, Benfica's chairman was arrested recently for corruption & money laundering. In Spain the country's fascist dictator was a Real Madrid supporter, the financial support given helped them to win 6 European Cups. Barcelona are in debt of over £1 billion. Manchester United's owners have taken hundreds of millions of £'s out of the club..There have been regular & consistent charges of corruption against Inter Milan, AC Milan & Juventus.
There was no witch hunt when Jack Walker ploughed his wealth into Blackburn Rovers & they won the first Premiership. Their was no action over Chelsea when Abromovich put his wealth into them & they were successful.
The question is why is their so much interest in the money invested in PSG & Manchester City. There has never been a level playing field & probably never will, so is this discrimination against wealthy Arab owners justifiable or is it a smokescreen?
Thanks for your interesting comment. I suspect that there is an interest in high profile scalps. The problems are endemic as you suggest and not limited to one or two clubs.
ReplyDelete