Skip to main content

Owls lose over £70m in five years

The doyen of football club accounts, the Swiss Ramble, analyses the 2019/20 accounts of Sheffield Wednesday from Zurich.

Sheffield Wedneday swung from £19m profit to £24m loss, largely due to prior year including £38m profit from selling the stadium and a £6.5m “confidential settlement payment”. Revenue fell £1.9m (8%) from £22.8m to £20.9m, while expenses were flat. Profit on player sales rose £3.4m to £6.2m.

The club sold their stadium for £60m, which gave them a £38m profit after deducting the £22m book value. If this transaction were excluded, they would have reported a £19m loss in 2019, which means that the £24m underlying loss in 2020 was £5m higher.

Most clubs in the Championship lose money, but Wednesday’s £24m loss is the sixth highest in the division to date, though far below Stoke City £88m.   operating loss (i.e. excluding player sales and interest) rose slightly from £28m to £30m, though much better than LUFC £65m, WBA £53m and Stoke City £49m. Almost every club in the competitive Championship posts large operating losses, i.e. half of them are above £30m.

The club have consistently lost money, only reporting a profit twice in the last decade, and both of those were due to one-offs. Underlying losses have been rising since the arrival of owner Dejphon Chansiri, aggregating £71m over the last five years (£109m excluding the stadium sale).

The Swiss Ramble estimates that COVID led to £3.2m reduction in revenue, split between £1.9m lost (match day £1.6m, TV rebate £0.3m) and £1.4m broadcasting deferred to 2020/21, offset by a £0.9m government grant, leading to a net £2.4m adverse impact.

Profit on player sales can also improve the bottom line, but this has not been a big money-spinner at Hillsborough. While the 2020 profit of £6.2m was the highest ever, (I think) they have made less than £16m profit from this activity in the last 10 years.

Based on the Swiss Ramble’s estimate, the most important revenue stream is broadcasting (41%), followed by match day (32%) and commercial (27%). Championship clubs without parachute payments have a much more even balance than Premier League clubs, who are far more reliant on TV money.

The owner Dejphon Chansiri has managed to grow revenue by £6m (40%) since he bought the club from £14.9m to £20.9m.   £21m revenue is mid-table in the Championship.  If parachute payments were excluded, £21m would move them up to 8th highest revenue in the Championship,

Commercial income fell £0.4m (7%) from £6.1m to £5.7m, the club’s lowest since 2016. This was mid-table in the Championship, far below the likes of Leeds £34m, Bristol City £14m and Stoke City £14m.

Wages fell £2.9m (8%) from £36.4m to £33.5m, which is £9m less than 2018 £42m peak (14 months), though still much more than £13m in 2015. Since these accounts many high earners (Fletcher, Forestieri, Rhodes, Westwood, Reach, etc) have left, so wages will drop significantly.  Even after the decrease, the £34m wage bill was 10th highest in the Championship, which means that the club has punched well below its weight.

The wages to turnover ratio was virtually unchanged at 161%, the sixth highest in the Championship. This is obviously unsustainable, though it is pretty much the norm in this division, where the vast majority of clubs have ratios well over 100%

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/