Skip to main content

United's finances and the change of management

The financial imperatives behind firing Solskjaer are clear. The Glazer family hope to return to pre-pandemic annual revenues of more than £600m this season, making it one of the richest football clubs in the world.

Much of this income is remarkably predictable. Broadcasting rights are sold centrally by the English Premier League and UefaEuropean football’s governing body. United’s Old Trafford stadium is sold out every match, maximising ticket and hospitality income. Sponsorship remains strong.

The one area of financial volatility surrounds whether the team qualifies for the Champions League, Europe’s most prestigious club contest in which €2bn is shared among participating clubs. A dismal run of five defeats in seven Premier League games means the club risks missing out on next season’s competition.

United’s strong business was built on enormous on-field success under Ferguson. Over 26 seasons, he led the club to 13 Premier League titles, two Champions Leagues and numerous other honours. As the football industry grew over recent decades, United became one of the sport’s pre-eminent brands.

Yet, as writer Rory Smith put it in the New York Times: “Ferguson does not seem to have left behind anyone at Old Trafford who truly understood the inner workings of his winning machine.”

It was clear that that Ferguson believed each successful team had a life cycle of about four years, after which time change was necessary, even if that meant transferring away established stars in favour of younger players.

Instead of this ruthless approach, United has been trapped in nostalgia, argues the Financial Times. Solskjaer was hired not as a coach with an elite record, but as a legendary ex-player.   In the view of the Pink 'Un there needs to be a clearer divide between the football and business sides of the club.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Spurs to sell minority stake

Tottenham Hotspur is in talks to sell a minority stake in a deal that could value it at up to £3.75 billion and pave the way for Joe Lewis and his family to sever ties with the Premier League football club. Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy is seeking an investment that values the club at between £3.5 billion and £3.75 billion, including debt. While the terms of any deal have not been finalised, City sources expect Spurs to sell about 10 per cent. The club is being advised by bankers from Rothschild on the sale. Tottenham wants to raise fresh capital for new player signings and to help fund the development of an academy for its women’s team, as well as a 30-storey hotel next to its north London stadium. The financier Amanda Staveley, who brokered the deal for Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund to take over Newcastle United, is understood to be among the parties to have expressed an interest in Tottenham. Staveley’s fund, PCP Capital Partners, has raised about £500 million to depl