Skip to main content

United's finances and the change of management

The financial imperatives behind firing Solskjaer are clear. The Glazer family hope to return to pre-pandemic annual revenues of more than £600m this season, making it one of the richest football clubs in the world.

Much of this income is remarkably predictable. Broadcasting rights are sold centrally by the English Premier League and UefaEuropean football’s governing body. United’s Old Trafford stadium is sold out every match, maximising ticket and hospitality income. Sponsorship remains strong.

The one area of financial volatility surrounds whether the team qualifies for the Champions League, Europe’s most prestigious club contest in which €2bn is shared among participating clubs. A dismal run of five defeats in seven Premier League games means the club risks missing out on next season’s competition.

United’s strong business was built on enormous on-field success under Ferguson. Over 26 seasons, he led the club to 13 Premier League titles, two Champions Leagues and numerous other honours. As the football industry grew over recent decades, United became one of the sport’s pre-eminent brands.

Yet, as writer Rory Smith put it in the New York Times: “Ferguson does not seem to have left behind anyone at Old Trafford who truly understood the inner workings of his winning machine.”

It was clear that that Ferguson believed each successful team had a life cycle of about four years, after which time change was necessary, even if that meant transferring away established stars in favour of younger players.

Instead of this ruthless approach, United has been trapped in nostalgia, argues the Financial Times. Solskjaer was hired not as a coach with an elite record, but as a legendary ex-player.   In the view of the Pink 'Un there needs to be a clearer divide between the football and business sides of the club.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...