Skip to main content

Liverpool close off the pitch gap with United

Following last night’s match between Manchester United and Liverpool, the Swiss Ramble thought it might be interesting to see how the finances of these clubs compare, particularly the direction of travel over the last 10 years (up to most recent accounts for the 2020/21 season).

10 years ago Manchester United’s £320m revenue was nearly twice as much as Liverpool £169m with the difference rising to a peak of £217m in 2017, but since then the gap has almost completely closed to only £7m with United’s £494m just ahead of Liverpool £487m.

Liverpool have earned more broadcasting income than United in each of the last four years, due to more success on the pitch, especially in Europe, where Liverpool’s exploits in the Champion League have generated much more TV money.

United earned much more match day income than Liverpool in 2013 (£109m vs £45m), but the gap had narrowed to £27m in 2019 (pre-pandemic) following the expansion of Anfield’s Main Stand. Both clubs suffered from games being played behind closed doors during COVID, especially United.

n 2016 United’s £268m commercial income was miles higher than Liverpool £116m, but United’s revenue has flatlined since then (and dropped during the pandemic), while Liverpool’s revenue has shot up to £218m, so is now only £15m less, thanks to new sponsorship deals (Standard Chartered & Nike).

In 2014 United £215m wages were 50% more than Liverpool £144m, but the gap nearly disappeared in 2021, down to just £9m (£323m vs £314m). Liverpool’s wages were higher in 2020, mainly due to bonuses: Liverpool won the Premier League, while United did not qualify for Champions League.

Both clubs have seen operating profits worsen, leading to large losses of around £40m in 2021. However, United’s decline is far more striking, steadily falling from a peak of £87m profit in 2016. Liverpool trended to post small operating profits before COVID struck.

Player sales and transfers

Where Liverpool have really outshone United is in player trading, generating higher profits from player sales every season since 2015. In the last 5 years, Liverpool made £274m profit from this activity, more than three times as much as United’s £81m.   Largely as a result of player sales (and much lower interest payable), Liverpool £156m pre-tax profit over the last 5 years is £91m better than United £65m. This is in stark contrast to the preceding 5-year period, when United’s £72m profit was £122m better than Liverpool’s £50m loss.

United have had much higher gross transfer spend than Liverpool: £1.4 bn over the last 10 years compared to £1.0 bn. Liverpool have only spent more than United three times in the last decade, though two of those came in the last three years (2019 and 2021).   When it comes to net spend, the difference is even more evident with United £1.0 bn in the last decade being nearly twice as much as Liverpool £542m. This is particularly the case in the last five years: United £630m vs. Liverpool £318m.

United gross debt has hardly moved over the last few years, standing at £530m in 2021, while Liverpool has risen to £198m. All United’s debt is owed externally, while Liverpool’s is a mixture (external £127m, owner £71m). Owner debt peaked at £110m in 2016 to fund stadium development.  Although United interest payments have fallen from their peak, they still paid £21m in 2021, compared to Liverpool £3m. Over the last 10 years, United have paid £303m, significantly more than Liverpool’s £26m.

Liverpool have invested £241m in infrastructure (stadium and training ground) in the last 10 years, mainly in the period between 2015 and 2017, which is a lot more than United’s £136m.

This analysis shows fairly clearly the progress that Liverpool have made off the pitch, largely closing the gap to United in terms of revenue and wages with better profitability, especially player trading. They have managed this with lower debt and interest payments (and no dividends).

The one area where United have “outperformed” Liverpool is the transfer market, as they have spent much more than their rivals, though not too many would argue that their recruitment has been superior. That said, many Liverpool fans would like to see the club strengthen their squad.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Reports about Charlton sale exaggerated

Reports have appeared in The Guardian and elsewhere that Charlton has been put up for sale. Richard Cawley is an authoritative local journalist who runs a South London Sport substack site.  He reached out to the club yesterday evening to ask for comment on The Guardian’s article. Early indications from the club have been that nothing has changed since the story about them seeking investment, except that it is now a different company doing it. Charlton have since managed to consolidate their place in the Championship, avoiding an instant return to League One, with their women’s side promoted to the WSL, returning to the top flight for the first time since 2007, although staying there is likely to be costly. It would be counter-intuitive for owners Global Football Partners not to progress the club when looking for investment, that the focus remains on driving it forward, that their spend this summer is in line with long-term planning and will see an increase in wages spent on players...

Hull City's 'strange' loan

When football finance guru Kieran Maguire seems flashing lights in a club's loan deal, I become concerned.  He is the leading football finance expert in the UK. Hull City have borrowed £55m against their stadium and training ground yet they should get £30m from the Premier League before long.  What is going on? https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cpwel48y51do