Skip to main content

Liverpool close off the pitch gap with United

Following last night’s match between Manchester United and Liverpool, the Swiss Ramble thought it might be interesting to see how the finances of these clubs compare, particularly the direction of travel over the last 10 years (up to most recent accounts for the 2020/21 season).

10 years ago Manchester United’s £320m revenue was nearly twice as much as Liverpool £169m with the difference rising to a peak of £217m in 2017, but since then the gap has almost completely closed to only £7m with United’s £494m just ahead of Liverpool £487m.

Liverpool have earned more broadcasting income than United in each of the last four years, due to more success on the pitch, especially in Europe, where Liverpool’s exploits in the Champion League have generated much more TV money.

United earned much more match day income than Liverpool in 2013 (£109m vs £45m), but the gap had narrowed to £27m in 2019 (pre-pandemic) following the expansion of Anfield’s Main Stand. Both clubs suffered from games being played behind closed doors during COVID, especially United.

n 2016 United’s £268m commercial income was miles higher than Liverpool £116m, but United’s revenue has flatlined since then (and dropped during the pandemic), while Liverpool’s revenue has shot up to £218m, so is now only £15m less, thanks to new sponsorship deals (Standard Chartered & Nike).

In 2014 United £215m wages were 50% more than Liverpool £144m, but the gap nearly disappeared in 2021, down to just £9m (£323m vs £314m). Liverpool’s wages were higher in 2020, mainly due to bonuses: Liverpool won the Premier League, while United did not qualify for Champions League.

Both clubs have seen operating profits worsen, leading to large losses of around £40m in 2021. However, United’s decline is far more striking, steadily falling from a peak of £87m profit in 2016. Liverpool trended to post small operating profits before COVID struck.

Player sales and transfers

Where Liverpool have really outshone United is in player trading, generating higher profits from player sales every season since 2015. In the last 5 years, Liverpool made £274m profit from this activity, more than three times as much as United’s £81m.   Largely as a result of player sales (and much lower interest payable), Liverpool £156m pre-tax profit over the last 5 years is £91m better than United £65m. This is in stark contrast to the preceding 5-year period, when United’s £72m profit was £122m better than Liverpool’s £50m loss.

United have had much higher gross transfer spend than Liverpool: £1.4 bn over the last 10 years compared to £1.0 bn. Liverpool have only spent more than United three times in the last decade, though two of those came in the last three years (2019 and 2021).   When it comes to net spend, the difference is even more evident with United £1.0 bn in the last decade being nearly twice as much as Liverpool £542m. This is particularly the case in the last five years: United £630m vs. Liverpool £318m.

United gross debt has hardly moved over the last few years, standing at £530m in 2021, while Liverpool has risen to £198m. All United’s debt is owed externally, while Liverpool’s is a mixture (external £127m, owner £71m). Owner debt peaked at £110m in 2016 to fund stadium development.  Although United interest payments have fallen from their peak, they still paid £21m in 2021, compared to Liverpool £3m. Over the last 10 years, United have paid £303m, significantly more than Liverpool’s £26m.

Liverpool have invested £241m in infrastructure (stadium and training ground) in the last 10 years, mainly in the period between 2015 and 2017, which is a lot more than United’s £136m.

This analysis shows fairly clearly the progress that Liverpool have made off the pitch, largely closing the gap to United in terms of revenue and wages with better profitability, especially player trading. They have managed this with lower debt and interest payments (and no dividends).

The one area where United have “outperformed” Liverpool is the transfer market, as they have spent much more than their rivals, though not too many would argue that their recruitment has been superior. That said, many Liverpool fans would like to see the club strengthen their squad.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/