Skip to main content

Liverpool close off the pitch gap with United

Following last night’s match between Manchester United and Liverpool, the Swiss Ramble thought it might be interesting to see how the finances of these clubs compare, particularly the direction of travel over the last 10 years (up to most recent accounts for the 2020/21 season).

10 years ago Manchester United’s £320m revenue was nearly twice as much as Liverpool £169m with the difference rising to a peak of £217m in 2017, but since then the gap has almost completely closed to only £7m with United’s £494m just ahead of Liverpool £487m.

Liverpool have earned more broadcasting income than United in each of the last four years, due to more success on the pitch, especially in Europe, where Liverpool’s exploits in the Champion League have generated much more TV money.

United earned much more match day income than Liverpool in 2013 (£109m vs £45m), but the gap had narrowed to £27m in 2019 (pre-pandemic) following the expansion of Anfield’s Main Stand. Both clubs suffered from games being played behind closed doors during COVID, especially United.

n 2016 United’s £268m commercial income was miles higher than Liverpool £116m, but United’s revenue has flatlined since then (and dropped during the pandemic), while Liverpool’s revenue has shot up to £218m, so is now only £15m less, thanks to new sponsorship deals (Standard Chartered & Nike).

In 2014 United £215m wages were 50% more than Liverpool £144m, but the gap nearly disappeared in 2021, down to just £9m (£323m vs £314m). Liverpool’s wages were higher in 2020, mainly due to bonuses: Liverpool won the Premier League, while United did not qualify for Champions League.

Both clubs have seen operating profits worsen, leading to large losses of around £40m in 2021. However, United’s decline is far more striking, steadily falling from a peak of £87m profit in 2016. Liverpool trended to post small operating profits before COVID struck.

Player sales and transfers

Where Liverpool have really outshone United is in player trading, generating higher profits from player sales every season since 2015. In the last 5 years, Liverpool made £274m profit from this activity, more than three times as much as United’s £81m.   Largely as a result of player sales (and much lower interest payable), Liverpool £156m pre-tax profit over the last 5 years is £91m better than United £65m. This is in stark contrast to the preceding 5-year period, when United’s £72m profit was £122m better than Liverpool’s £50m loss.

United have had much higher gross transfer spend than Liverpool: £1.4 bn over the last 10 years compared to £1.0 bn. Liverpool have only spent more than United three times in the last decade, though two of those came in the last three years (2019 and 2021).   When it comes to net spend, the difference is even more evident with United £1.0 bn in the last decade being nearly twice as much as Liverpool £542m. This is particularly the case in the last five years: United £630m vs. Liverpool £318m.

United gross debt has hardly moved over the last few years, standing at £530m in 2021, while Liverpool has risen to £198m. All United’s debt is owed externally, while Liverpool’s is a mixture (external £127m, owner £71m). Owner debt peaked at £110m in 2016 to fund stadium development.  Although United interest payments have fallen from their peak, they still paid £21m in 2021, compared to Liverpool £3m. Over the last 10 years, United have paid £303m, significantly more than Liverpool’s £26m.

Liverpool have invested £241m in infrastructure (stadium and training ground) in the last 10 years, mainly in the period between 2015 and 2017, which is a lot more than United’s £136m.

This analysis shows fairly clearly the progress that Liverpool have made off the pitch, largely closing the gap to United in terms of revenue and wages with better profitability, especially player trading. They have managed this with lower debt and interest payments (and no dividends).

The one area where United have “outperformed” Liverpool is the transfer market, as they have spent much more than their rivals, though not too many would argue that their recruitment has been superior. That said, many Liverpool fans would like to see the club strengthen their squad.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...

Spurs to sell minority stake

Tottenham Hotspur is in talks to sell a minority stake in a deal that could value it at up to £3.75 billion and pave the way for Joe Lewis and his family to sever ties with the Premier League football club. Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy is seeking an investment that values the club at between £3.5 billion and £3.75 billion, including debt. While the terms of any deal have not been finalised, City sources expect Spurs to sell about 10 per cent. The club is being advised by bankers from Rothschild on the sale. Tottenham wants to raise fresh capital for new player signings and to help fund the development of an academy for its women’s team, as well as a 30-storey hotel next to its north London stadium. The financier Amanda Staveley, who brokered the deal for Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund to take over Newcastle United, is understood to be among the parties to have expressed an interest in Tottenham. Staveley’s fund, PCP Capital Partners, has raised about £500 million to ...

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...