Skip to main content

Bayern's financial advantage over Dortmund

Following Bayern Munich’s shock defeat to Mainz last weekend, they have been overtaken by Borussia Dortmund, who now lead the Bundesliga. Although second place would be regarded as a fine achievement by most clubs, this is certainly not the case for Bayern, who are seemingly in crisis mode.

For some context, Bayern have won the Bundesliga for the last 10 years in a row, so anything other than victory would be regarded as a failure.   Part of the reason for Bayern’s imperious record over the last decade is their financial power.

In 2021/22 Bayern reported a €17m pre-tax profit in contrast to Dortmund’s €33m loss, mainly because their revenue is significantly higher than their rivals, partially offset by Dortmund’s better profit from player sales. Bayern’s cost base is also much higher.

In fact, Bayern have now been profitable for an amazing 30 years in a row, including €361m in the last decade alone. Profits have been lower in the last three seasons, due to COVID restrictions, but other clubs would still be envious of their results.

Dortmund had also made money for nine consecutive seasons up to 2019, though they have posted losses in each of the past three years, partly due to the impact of the pandemic, partly as they strive to compete Bayern. Their losses in this period added up to €153m, reducing their overall profit since 2013 to only €27m, less than a tenth of their rivals.

Dortmund’s business model is to try to offset operating losses with profits from player trading. In this way, they have generated nearly half a billion Euros (€472m) since 2013, including €435m in the last seven years alone.

Bayern have been nowhere near so active with their €270m profit from player sales in the last 10 years being around €200m less than Dortmund. Indeed, their gain was only €7m in 2021/22. This is basically because Bayern don’t need to make money here, as they are already doing just fine with their normal operations.

Bayern’s €653m revenue is nearly €300m more than Dortmund’s €357m. They are ahead in all three revenue streams, especially commercial, where the gap is over €200m.

Looked at another way, Bayern’s €654m revenue was over 80% more than Dortmund’s €357m, which is a massive difference between the first and second ranked clubs in a country. This is far more than the gap in other leading countries with the exception of France where PSG are in a class of their own financially.

Bayern earned €90m from the Bundesliga TV deal last season, which was €10m more than Dortmund’s €80m. There was hardly any difference in the two clubs’ payments from the domestic deal, but Bayern received €9m more than Dortmund from the international element.

To place this into perspective, the total payment was lower than the club that finished last in the Premier League in 2021/22 (Norwich City), who received €114m TV money, which was around 25% more than the German champions.

Both Bayern and Dortmund set new club records for commercial income last season. However, Bayern’s €378m was over twice as much as Dortmund’s €174m with the difference being over €200m.

Bayern’s €349m wage bill is €118m more than Dortmund, even though their €231m in 2021/22 was a club record. The gap has been wider in the past, but this is still a considerable advantage.

There is no doubt that Bayern have a huge financial advantage over Dortmund, as their revenue and wages are significantly higher.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Reports about Charlton sale exaggerated

Reports have appeared in The Guardian and elsewhere that Charlton has been put up for sale. Richard Cawley is an authoritative local journalist who runs a South London Sport substack site.  He reached out to the club yesterday evening to ask for comment on The Guardian’s article. Early indications from the club have been that nothing has changed since the story about them seeking investment, except that it is now a different company doing it. Charlton have since managed to consolidate their place in the Championship, avoiding an instant return to League One, with their women’s side promoted to the WSL, returning to the top flight for the first time since 2007, although staying there is likely to be costly. It would be counter-intuitive for owners Global Football Partners not to progress the club when looking for investment, that the focus remains on driving it forward, that their spend this summer is in line with long-term planning and will see an increase in wages spent on players...

Hull City's 'strange' loan

When football finance guru Kieran Maguire seems flashing lights in a club's loan deal, I become concerned.  He is the leading football finance expert in the UK. Hull City have borrowed £55m against their stadium and training ground yet they should get £30m from the Premier League before long.  What is going on? https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cpwel48y51do