Skip to main content

Bayern's financial advantage over Dortmund

Following Bayern Munich’s shock defeat to Mainz last weekend, they have been overtaken by Borussia Dortmund, who now lead the Bundesliga. Although second place would be regarded as a fine achievement by most clubs, this is certainly not the case for Bayern, who are seemingly in crisis mode.

For some context, Bayern have won the Bundesliga for the last 10 years in a row, so anything other than victory would be regarded as a failure.   Part of the reason for Bayern’s imperious record over the last decade is their financial power.

In 2021/22 Bayern reported a €17m pre-tax profit in contrast to Dortmund’s €33m loss, mainly because their revenue is significantly higher than their rivals, partially offset by Dortmund’s better profit from player sales. Bayern’s cost base is also much higher.

In fact, Bayern have now been profitable for an amazing 30 years in a row, including €361m in the last decade alone. Profits have been lower in the last three seasons, due to COVID restrictions, but other clubs would still be envious of their results.

Dortmund had also made money for nine consecutive seasons up to 2019, though they have posted losses in each of the past three years, partly due to the impact of the pandemic, partly as they strive to compete Bayern. Their losses in this period added up to €153m, reducing their overall profit since 2013 to only €27m, less than a tenth of their rivals.

Dortmund’s business model is to try to offset operating losses with profits from player trading. In this way, they have generated nearly half a billion Euros (€472m) since 2013, including €435m in the last seven years alone.

Bayern have been nowhere near so active with their €270m profit from player sales in the last 10 years being around €200m less than Dortmund. Indeed, their gain was only €7m in 2021/22. This is basically because Bayern don’t need to make money here, as they are already doing just fine with their normal operations.

Bayern’s €653m revenue is nearly €300m more than Dortmund’s €357m. They are ahead in all three revenue streams, especially commercial, where the gap is over €200m.

Looked at another way, Bayern’s €654m revenue was over 80% more than Dortmund’s €357m, which is a massive difference between the first and second ranked clubs in a country. This is far more than the gap in other leading countries with the exception of France where PSG are in a class of their own financially.

Bayern earned €90m from the Bundesliga TV deal last season, which was €10m more than Dortmund’s €80m. There was hardly any difference in the two clubs’ payments from the domestic deal, but Bayern received €9m more than Dortmund from the international element.

To place this into perspective, the total payment was lower than the club that finished last in the Premier League in 2021/22 (Norwich City), who received €114m TV money, which was around 25% more than the German champions.

Both Bayern and Dortmund set new club records for commercial income last season. However, Bayern’s €378m was over twice as much as Dortmund’s €174m with the difference being over €200m.

Bayern’s €349m wage bill is €118m more than Dortmund, even though their €231m in 2021/22 was a club record. The gap has been wider in the past, but this is still a considerable advantage.

There is no doubt that Bayern have a huge financial advantage over Dortmund, as their revenue and wages are significantly higher.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/