Skip to main content

Bayern's financial advantage over Dortmund

Following Bayern Munich’s shock defeat to Mainz last weekend, they have been overtaken by Borussia Dortmund, who now lead the Bundesliga. Although second place would be regarded as a fine achievement by most clubs, this is certainly not the case for Bayern, who are seemingly in crisis mode.

For some context, Bayern have won the Bundesliga for the last 10 years in a row, so anything other than victory would be regarded as a failure.   Part of the reason for Bayern’s imperious record over the last decade is their financial power.

In 2021/22 Bayern reported a €17m pre-tax profit in contrast to Dortmund’s €33m loss, mainly because their revenue is significantly higher than their rivals, partially offset by Dortmund’s better profit from player sales. Bayern’s cost base is also much higher.

In fact, Bayern have now been profitable for an amazing 30 years in a row, including €361m in the last decade alone. Profits have been lower in the last three seasons, due to COVID restrictions, but other clubs would still be envious of their results.

Dortmund had also made money for nine consecutive seasons up to 2019, though they have posted losses in each of the past three years, partly due to the impact of the pandemic, partly as they strive to compete Bayern. Their losses in this period added up to €153m, reducing their overall profit since 2013 to only €27m, less than a tenth of their rivals.

Dortmund’s business model is to try to offset operating losses with profits from player trading. In this way, they have generated nearly half a billion Euros (€472m) since 2013, including €435m in the last seven years alone.

Bayern have been nowhere near so active with their €270m profit from player sales in the last 10 years being around €200m less than Dortmund. Indeed, their gain was only €7m in 2021/22. This is basically because Bayern don’t need to make money here, as they are already doing just fine with their normal operations.

Bayern’s €653m revenue is nearly €300m more than Dortmund’s €357m. They are ahead in all three revenue streams, especially commercial, where the gap is over €200m.

Looked at another way, Bayern’s €654m revenue was over 80% more than Dortmund’s €357m, which is a massive difference between the first and second ranked clubs in a country. This is far more than the gap in other leading countries with the exception of France where PSG are in a class of their own financially.

Bayern earned €90m from the Bundesliga TV deal last season, which was €10m more than Dortmund’s €80m. There was hardly any difference in the two clubs’ payments from the domestic deal, but Bayern received €9m more than Dortmund from the international element.

To place this into perspective, the total payment was lower than the club that finished last in the Premier League in 2021/22 (Norwich City), who received €114m TV money, which was around 25% more than the German champions.

Both Bayern and Dortmund set new club records for commercial income last season. However, Bayern’s €378m was over twice as much as Dortmund’s €174m with the difference being over €200m.

Bayern’s €349m wage bill is €118m more than Dortmund, even though their €231m in 2021/22 was a club record. The gap has been wider in the past, but this is still a considerable advantage.

There is no doubt that Bayern have a huge financial advantage over Dortmund, as their revenue and wages are significantly higher.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...