Skip to main content

Burnley financial results better than expected

Despite relegation, Burnley actually managed to deliver a £36m pre-tax profit in 2021/22, compared to a £3m loss the previous year. Revenue rose £8m (7%) from £115m to £123m, but the bottom line improvement was very largely driven by profit from player sales shooting up from £5m to £55m.

Burnley’s £36m profit was actually the second best financial performances in the 2021/22 Premier League, only surpassed by Manchester City’s £42m. In contrast, many clubs reported huge losses last season.

Burnley’s profit from player sales rose £50m from £5m to a club record £55m. Many players were released for nothing, but the club got decent money for four departures: Chris Wood and Nick Pope to Newcastle United, Nathan Collins to Wolves and Dwight McNeil to Everton.

This was a deliberate strategy to raise funds “in anticipation of lower turnover next season due to relegation”. The club then used a portion of these proceeds to pay down £20m of debt with the remainder available to invest in the squad and fund operations in the Championship.

This was the sixth highest player trading profit in the Premier League last season, only below Chelsea £123m, Aston Villa £97m, Manchester City £68m, Everton £68m and Brighton £62m.

Unlike most other football clubs, Burnley have a good track record in terms of profitability. In the last six years in the Premier League, they only once posted a loss – and that was only £3m in 2020/21, a season ravaged by COVID. In that period the club has generated an impressive £110m profit.

The club noted that “the reduction in total wages and the influx of cash from transfer fees more than offset the loss of broadcasting revenue due to relegation”, but it is still likely that Burnley will make a loss in the 2022/23 Championship, given the much lower player sales.   However, it will be a different story next season, as the club will once again benefit from the lucrative Premier League TV deal, so they are a good bet to return to profitability.

Despite the growth last season, Burnley’s £123m revenue was still down £16m (11%) from the club’s peak in 2017/18, when they finished in a highly creditable 7th place in the Premier League.  The worsening performance on the pitch has driven a sizeable reduction in broadcasting income, though this still accounted for 85% of total revenue.

Burnley’s financial challenge is very clearly seen by their £123m revenue being the lowest in the Premier League, a full £5m behind Watford £128m and £11m behind Norwich City £134m.  This was miles below the elite, e.g. the top four clubs all earned more than four times as much as Burnley, led by Manchester City £613m, while the gap to sixth placed Arsenal was nearly quarter of a billion pounds.

Burnley’s wages rose £6m (7%) from £86m to £92m, despite not having to pay any bonuses for Premier League survival, as the number of players, managerial and training staff increased from 133 to 152. Presumably this was also inflated by a once-off payment for manager Sean Dyche’s dismissal.  This is the club’s second highest wage bill ever, only surpassed by £100m in 2019/20, though that was exacerbated by the accounting period covering 13 months. Wages have therefore grown by £31m (50%) from £61m since the first season after promotion in 2016/17.

In many ways, it is not that surprising that Burnley were relegated, as their £92m wages were in the bottom three of the Premier League, given the strong correlation between wages and performance.

Burnley more than doubled the amount they spent on player purchases from £19m to £41m in 2021/22, though this was still one of the lowest in the Premier League, only ahead of Brentford, Wolves and Watford.   This was miles below the likes of Aston Villa £204m, Arsenal £188m and Tottenham £160m.  This season was a different story, as Burnley were the biggest spenders in the Championship with £23m, based on Transfermarkt figures.

In the last five years, only Manchester United have provided more money to their owners. In that period, some other clubs received substantial amounts from their owners, including Everton £574m, Chelsea £416m and Aston Villa £351m.

Given the understandable worries of many Burnley fans after relegation, these financial results are a lot better than expected.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Reports about Charlton sale exaggerated

Reports have appeared in The Guardian and elsewhere that Charlton has been put up for sale. Richard Cawley is an authoritative local journalist who runs a South London Sport substack site.  He reached out to the club yesterday evening to ask for comment on The Guardian’s article. Early indications from the club have been that nothing has changed since the story about them seeking investment, except that it is now a different company doing it. Charlton have since managed to consolidate their place in the Championship, avoiding an instant return to League One, with their women’s side promoted to the WSL, returning to the top flight for the first time since 2007, although staying there is likely to be costly. It would be counter-intuitive for owners Global Football Partners not to progress the club when looking for investment, that the focus remains on driving it forward, that their spend this summer is in line with long-term planning and will see an increase in wages spent on players...

Hull City's 'strange' loan

When football finance guru Kieran Maguire seems flashing lights in a club's loan deal, I become concerned.  He is the leading football finance expert in the UK. Hull City have borrowed £55m against their stadium and training ground yet they should get £30m from the Premier League before long.  What is going on? https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cpwel48y51do