Burnley financial results better than expected

Despite relegation, Burnley actually managed to deliver a £36m pre-tax profit in 2021/22, compared to a £3m loss the previous year. Revenue rose £8m (7%) from £115m to £123m, but the bottom line improvement was very largely driven by profit from player sales shooting up from £5m to £55m.

Burnley’s £36m profit was actually the second best financial performances in the 2021/22 Premier League, only surpassed by Manchester City’s £42m. In contrast, many clubs reported huge losses last season.

Burnley’s profit from player sales rose £50m from £5m to a club record £55m. Many players were released for nothing, but the club got decent money for four departures: Chris Wood and Nick Pope to Newcastle United, Nathan Collins to Wolves and Dwight McNeil to Everton.

This was a deliberate strategy to raise funds “in anticipation of lower turnover next season due to relegation”. The club then used a portion of these proceeds to pay down £20m of debt with the remainder available to invest in the squad and fund operations in the Championship.

This was the sixth highest player trading profit in the Premier League last season, only below Chelsea £123m, Aston Villa £97m, Manchester City £68m, Everton £68m and Brighton £62m.

Unlike most other football clubs, Burnley have a good track record in terms of profitability. In the last six years in the Premier League, they only once posted a loss – and that was only £3m in 2020/21, a season ravaged by COVID. In that period the club has generated an impressive £110m profit.

The club noted that “the reduction in total wages and the influx of cash from transfer fees more than offset the loss of broadcasting revenue due to relegation”, but it is still likely that Burnley will make a loss in the 2022/23 Championship, given the much lower player sales. However, it will be a different story next season, as the club will once again benefit from the lucrative Premier League TV deal, so they are a good bet to return to profitability.

Despite the growth last season, Burnley’s £123m revenue was still down £16m (11%) from the club’s peak in 2017/18, when they finished in a highly creditable 7th place in the Premier League. The worsening performance on the pitch has driven a sizeable reduction in broadcasting income, though this still accounted for 85% of total revenue.

Burnley’s financial challenge is very clearly seen by their £123m revenue being the lowest in the Premier League, a full £5m behind Watford £128m and £11m behind Norwich City £134m. This was miles below the elite, e.g. the top four clubs all earned more than four times as much as Burnley, led by Manchester City £613m, while the gap to sixth placed Arsenal was nearly quarter of a billion pounds.

Burnley’s wages rose £6m (7%) from £86m to £92m, despite not having to pay any bonuses for Premier League survival, as the number of players, managerial and training staff increased from 133 to 152. Presumably this was also inflated by a once-off payment for manager Sean Dyche’s dismissal. This is the club’s second highest wage bill ever, only surpassed by £100m in 2019/20, though that was exacerbated by the accounting period covering 13 months. Wages have therefore grown by £31m (50%) from £61m since the first season after promotion in 2016/17.

In many ways, it is not that surprising that Burnley were relegated, as their £92m wages were in the bottom three of the Premier League, given the strong correlation between wages and performance.

Burnley more than doubled the amount they spent on player purchases from £19m to £41m in 2021/22, though this was still one of the lowest in the Premier League, only ahead of Brentford, Wolves and Watford. This was miles below the likes of Aston Villa £204m, Arsenal £188m and Tottenham £160m. This season was a different story, as Burnley were the biggest spenders in the Championship with £23m, based on Transfermarkt figures.

In the last five years, only Manchester United have provided more money to their owners. In that period, some other clubs received substantial amounts from their owners, including Everton £574m, Chelsea £416m and Aston Villa £351m.

Given the understandable worries of many Burnley fans after relegation, these financial results are a lot better than expected.

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000. The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts. Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Spurs to sell minority stake

Tottenham Hotspur is in talks to sell a minority stake in a deal that could value it at up to £3.75 billion and pave the way for Joe Lewis and his family to sever ties with the Premier League football club. Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy is seeking an investment that values the club at between £3.5 billion and £3.75 billion, including debt. While the terms of any deal have not been finalised, City sources expect Spurs to sell about 10 per cent. The club is being advised by bankers from Rothschild on the sale. Tottenham wants to raise fresh capital for new player signings and to help fund the development of an academy for its women’s team, as well as a 30-storey hotel next to its north London stadium. The financier Amanda Staveley, who brokered the deal for Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund to take over Newcastle United, is understood to be among the parties to have expressed an interest in Tottenham. Staveley’s fund, PCP Capital Partners, has raised about £500 million to depl

The Political Economy of Football V2

Search This Blog