Skip to main content

Did ambitious overreach undermine Leicester?

Usually, when a club is relegated, its fans can point to a lack of ambition or interest from their owners and management. The opposite is true at Leicester.

They have aspired to challenge the “Big Six”, disrupt the established elite of English football, and eventually close the gap and claim a seat alongside them at the top table. By and large, they have done that. They have claimed two top-five finishes and became one of only seven clubs to actually lift the Premier League trophy.

Now they are the second former champions to be relegated after Blackburn Rovers in 1998-99 and one of the most expensively assembled squads ever to drop through the trap door. 

Leicester have always been an ambitious club under the ownership of King Power and the Srivaddhanaprabha family. They have invested heavily in the club, and continue to do so, but in recent years, that has accelerated.

The overreach is shown by the increased expenditure on contracts for new and existing players, taking the wage bill up to the seventh-highest in the league. That expenditure includes Brendan Rodgers, who they made the highest-paid manager in the club’s history.

There has been huge expenditure on the new training ground at Seagrave and the King Power Stadium project, with loans secured against future Premier League television money to pay for them. That money will no longer arrive in the same volume but the bills still have to be paid.

To obtain regular European football and the extra revenue that offers, you have to increase expenditure, but without guaranteed extra revenue, how can you afford the extra expenditure? There is no wriggle room for failure.

Leicester became overstretched and had to pump the breaks on their expenditure, mainly with one eye on UEFA’s new financial sustainability regulations, which their 85 per cent expenditure-to-revenue ratio wouldn’t meet. They were already on UEFA’s Watch List.

The owners are committed to preserving the late-chairman Khun Vichai’s vision for Leicester, despite this huge setback.  They plan to push on with the development of the East Stand and the surrounding area to boost the club’s matchday revenue. King Power will also continue to provide financial support, covering the club’s operations through a loan facility the club can draw upon if required.

The budget for Leicester’s playing squad will have to be dramatically cut down as profit and sustainability rules in the Championship allow only £39m losses over three years rather than the £105m in the Premier League, although top-flight losses will be factored into the calculations if Leicester remain in the Championship over the next three years.

Relegation clauses in players’ contracts will help reduce the expenditure as some will have to take pay cuts, while others could leave if release clauses are triggered by other clubs, ensuring Leicester don’t carry too many big wage earners in the Championship.

However, Leicester are still likely to have the biggest budget in the division next season. Their expenditure will be dictated by the amount raised through sales but there will be money made available to spend to get back into the Premier League.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Lau on the ropes

Financial challenges are building up for Guichan Lau whose company WBA Holdings owns 66 per cent of West Bromwich Albion.   His company's accounts show that it is in default on a £2 million from a West Midlands heating company called Warmfront Holdings. Warmfront has agreed to take no action to reclaim the loan and interest until February next year.  Given a punitive rate of interest of 5 per cent a month, the amount outstanding will then be around £4 million. Lai has missed three deadlines to repay a loan from the Baggies to his Hong Kong company Wisdom Smart Corporation.  [sic]  Meanwhile the club have a £20m loan from MSD UK holdings at an annual interest rate of 13.8 per cent.