Skip to main content

Sampdoria takeover finalised

Whisper it quietly, but it looks like the ownership saga at Sampdoria might just be coming to an end, as the shareholders have approved an agreement for the takeover of the club by Leeds United owner Andrea Radrizzani and his partner Matteo Manfredi through Gestio Capital and Aser Holding. It is also expected that QSI, the owners of Paris Saint-Germain, will take a minority stake.

The club had previously been involved in negotiations with Alessandro Barnaba and American investment firm Merlyn Partners, the owners of Lille, but their interest ultimately did not come to anything.

However, it looks like the agreement came too late to make the payment of three month’s wages (around €13.5m) before the 30th May deadline, which was needed to avoid a four points penalty next season.

After a terrible season, Sampdoria were already relegated to Serie B, but the fans had been concerned that their club might be declared bankrupt, which would have resulted in further demotion to the bottom of the Italian football pyramid.

The club has been in turmoil ever since previous owner Massimo Ferrero was arrested in December 2021 for issues relating to his business affairs elsewhere, i.e. not involving Sampdoria, which meant that he stepped down as president, necessitating the appointment of a new board under the chairmanship of Lanna, a former player.

Film producer Ferrero had purchased Sampdoria from the Garrone family in June 2014 for around €15m including the club’s debt. He has angered fans by his refusal to sell to new owners that would be more likely to provide the investment needed to relaunch the Blucerchiati.

Sampdoria have now suffered losses three years in a row, adding up to €60m, though this would have been €135m without the benefit of the suspended player amortisation and depreciation. Of course, this accounting adjustment will deflate future profits, proving once again that there is no such thing as a free lunch.

The club had actually been profitable in the preceding three years, though last season was the worst financial result since 2012/13 - even after the benefit of the fancy financial footwork.

Profit from player sales has dried up in the last two years with just €15m made in this period, which has had an obvious impact on Sampdoria’s bottom line. This is significantly lower than the preceding four years, when they generated an impressive €176m, averaging €44m a season.  This factor alone goes a long way to explaining why Sampdoria found themselves in financial strife, as they seemingly lost the ability to make money from player sales, exacerbated by the onset of COVID.

It’s when we look at Sampdoria’s debt that we begin to get a better understanding of their problems. Their gross financial debt increased by €29m from €67m to €96m last season, which means that this has nearly quadrupled in just three years from only €26m in 2019.  This comprises €72m owed to banks and €24m owed to other financial institutions, with the latter debt being secured on TV money €17m and transfer proceeds €7m.

Sampdoria’s debt is entirely owed to external lenders, whereas other clubs have benefited from owner loans, most notably Sassuolo.  Furthermore, Sampdoria’s debt is very high compared to their revenue. If we include profit from player sales, then Sampdoria’s debt was 1.4x as much as revenue, which was the third highest in Italy, only surpassed by Roma and Genoa.

Radrizzani did not mention what the implications are for Leeds United, where he currently owns 56%, but the feeling is that his acquisition of Sampdoria will hasten his departure, leaving the way clear for a full takeover by 49ers Enterprises, who hold the remaining 44% of the club.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/