Skip to main content

How Everton's new stadium will be funded

The group aiming to take a significant stake in Everton is already providing them with funding for their new stadium and is “on track” to take two positions on the Premier League club’s board.

MSP Sports Capital has been in exclusive talks with Everton’s majority owner, Farhad Moshiri, for the past two weeks about investment into Everton Stadium Development Company, the business Moshiri set up in 2017 to oversee the construction of the club’s new home at Bramley-Moore Dock.

The proposed deal would see a limited partnership led by New York-based MSP effectively give Moshiri £100million to £150million ($124m to $187m) in loans that can be converted to equity in the Merseyside club.

The British-Iranian billionaire has poured at least £750m of his fortune into Everton since taking control of the club in 2016, with £400m of that sum going into the new stadium alone.

But there is still at least £360m needed to finish the stadium, as the project’s initial budget of £500m has grown to £760m. Moshiri had hoped to fund this in much the same way Tottenham Hotspur financed their new home, via cheap, long-term debt sourced by the two global banks he appointed in 2020, JPMorgan and MUFG.

Unfortunately, several factors have combined to make investors more reluctant to invest in Everton’s ambitious building project than Tottenham’s.

Firstly, the club’s financial performance over the past five years has been shocking, with losses of more than £400m since 2018. Secondly, the club have only narrowly avoided relegation these past two seasons. And, finally, Moshiri’s funding plan also included a large contribution for the stadium’s naming rights from companies connected to his long-term business partner and friend Alisher Usmanov.

That source of funds was shut off — along with several lucrative sponsorships for the team — when the UK government sanctioned Usmanov for his links to the Russian state in the weeks following the full-scale invasion of Ukraine last year. And to compound Moshiri’s difficulties, his own bank accounts in Russia were frozen because of his British citizenship, leaving him unable to fill the funding gap.

Faced with these circumstances, he has been forced to consider options that could see his stake in Everton reduce from its current 94 per cent to more like 60 per cent.

MSP’s proposal would see it provide £100m in loans with warrants — a type of security that enables lenders to buy shares at a low, fixed price — that would give the firm a 25 per cent stake in Everton. However, MSP could end up with an even bigger stake as Everton need more like £150m to cover the funding gap at Bramley-Moore Dock and the club’s day-to-day needs.

Once the stadium is built and hopefully adds £40m to £60m to Everton’s turnover, the club’s owners would then try to refinance all of Everton’s borrowings with a large, long-term corporate bond. Assuming global interest rates go the way most economists are predicting, this could happen within three years. Any early repayment penalty on the construction loan would be cancelled out by the lower cost of borrowing.

It should also be noted that if Everton do borrow £360m to finish the stadium, it would take the total amount of interest-bearing debt they are carrying past £500m, as they already have significant loans from Metro Bank and Cheshire-based private lender Rights and Media Funding.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/