Skip to main content

Is Joe Lewis the last of a kind?

Allegations of insider trading against Joe Lewis didn’t just make the financial pages. That’s because even with a 98-metre yacht and an art collection full of Picasso and Matisse, the Bahamas-based billionaire is best known for owning Tottenham Hotspur for more than two decades.

He acquired it from one time market trader Alan Sugar, noted for his remark about how money put into football was like prune juice.   Sugar wasn’t sophisticated, but he was street smart.

Lewis, who was released on a $300mn bond secured by his yacht and private plane after entering a not guilty plea in New York, survived big changes in the business of football over two decades.

With multi-club ownership now back in vogue, Spurs chair Daniel Levy and Lewis were ahead of the game in the 1990s and 2000s, when they owned stakes in teams across Europe, including Scotland’s Rangers, Czech Republic’s Slavia Prague, and AEK Athens of Greece. Even then, multi-club ownership raised concerns.

Born in an east London pub in 1937, Lewis now looks like a rare breed in a league where English owners are outnumbered by foreigners, ranging from US private equity types to sovereign wealth funds.

The tycoon officially gave up control of Spurs in October 2022, handing responsibility to a pair of Bahamas-based administrators at the helm of a trust that controls ENIC, the company that owns more than 86 per cent of the club’s shares.

Unspecified Lewis family members are “potential beneficiaries” of the trust but not the man himself. Until that change last October, Lewis was the longest-serving Premier League owner.

Tottenham’s stance is that the charges against Lewis are “a legal matter unconnected with the club”.

But should Lewis’s run-in with the law reignite takeover interest from investors, he and Levy, the potential beneficiary of separate trusts that own nearly 30 per cent of ENIC, have built a club with a reputation for careful financial management, arguably at the expense of the trophy cabinet.

In the decade to 2021/22, no Premier League club made a higher pre-tax profit than Spurs’ £203mn, according to football finance analyst Swiss Ramble, although fans complain at the lack of trophies on the pitch.

Spurs’ revenue totalled £48mn the year before Lewis bought the club, with 46 per cent coming from ticket sales and 25 per cent from television. In 2021/22, the club’s revenue amounted to £444mn, more than nine times higher, with nearly a third coming from TV and less than a quarter from match receipts.

Part of that can be explained by the exponential increase in the value of the Premier League’s broadcast rights. The League reported revenue of £244mn in the year ended July 2000. In the 2022 fiscal year, that figure had smashed through the £3bn mark.

It’s also down to the construction of a longer-term asset. The Tottenham Hotspur Stadium, completed in 2019 at a cost of more than £1bn, hasn’t just increased Spurs’ match day revenue; it’s a modern arena that hosts NFL games and music concerts too.

In February, Spurs struck a 15-year partnership with Formula One, the car racing series, to bring karting to the stadium, another drive to make money even when the club isn’t playing home matches.

The Lewis family’s intentions are anyone’s guess, but the Spurs trust has an asset that’s worth keeping. Or selling.  Fans would just like to see some silverware.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...