Skip to main content

The challenges facing Wolves

These are challenging times at Wolves. It is a period unlike anything seen since the Chinese conglomerate Fosun purchased Wolves in 2016 and it comes amid widespread speculation the club are for sale — a claim that is repeatedly denied but refuses to go away, especially as Grasshoppers Zurich, effectively Wolves’ sister club, are on the market.

The need to bring in more money than they spend is due in part to the risk of breaching the Premier League’s regulations on profit and sustainability, known commonly as financial fair play (FFP).

But the issue is broader than simply staying within the rules. Fosun have invested heavily in Wolves in recent years, writing off a £126.5million ($163.5m) loan in the 2020-21 accounts and at least partly funding around £175million of spending in the past two transfer windows, even if much of the money in the past year has been spent poorly.

Now they want a return on their investment, not just on the pitch, but on the balance sheet, too.

The suggestion that FFP is not an issue would be misleading. Wolves declared a loss of £46million in the 2021-22 financial year. Any further analysis is based on educated guesswork given the absence of published information beyond May 2022.

But if estimates from figures within the club of an approximate £80million loss in the 2022-23 figures, due to be published next spring, are broadly accurate, Wolves would be at risk of breaching the maximum permitted £105million loss over a three-year period by the end of 2023-24.

Fosun’s long-stated aim has been to make Wolves a self-sustaining entity, owned by the Chinese-based multi-national but not funded by it. Last year, that ambition fell by the wayside.

Fosun is an investment company and it now wants to claw back its spending. This means the plans for developing and improving Molineux, which were unveiled in the 2018-19 season, are still no closer to being realised, with parts of the ground, in particular the Steve Bull Stand, now falling behind comparable venues elsewhere in the Premier League.

Fosun have previously made clear that investment would be focused on the team. Now that has slowed, the frustration around facilities will grow.

So, what of the future? The consistent line from senior figures at Molineux is that Wolves are not for sale and it is true that the club — a public company — have not declared their availability officially.

But the not-for-sale line is at odds with the widespread belief in football finance circles, which are abuzz with talk of middlemen seeking investors for Wolves, to buy the club from Fosun or purchase a minority stake to generate funds for stadium or training ground improvements.

Exploring the possibility of a sale would tally with Fosun International chairman Guo Guangchang’s stated aim of “streamlining the organisation” to focus on its core businesses.

China’s change of policy

There has been a well-publicised shift in policy from the Chinese state, which in the mid-2010s was encouraging its businesses to invest in western football but has more recently retreated from the scene.   There has been a change of tack from President Xi, who originally wanted an expansion into football club ownership as part of a broader scheme of extending Chinese influence and potentially hosting a World Cup.

Fosun was founded in 1992 in Shanghai as a market research company and grew quickly over the next decade to become one of China’s largest conglomerates, extending its business into healthcare, property and steel.

A range of other Chinese-owned clubs, including Reading, the recently sold Birmingham City, and Wolves’ fierce rivals West Bromwich Albion, have been left in a mess by Chinese owners unable or unwilling to invest.

For Wolves, the medium-term future remains unclear, but the immediate picture is a little more straightforward but difficult nonetheless. Wolves need to raise more money to fund the purchases Lopetegui wants.

But there are reasons for optimism. Even last season, with a squad not to Lopetegui’s specifications and worn down by their early season struggles, Wolves picked up results that would have secured a comfortable mid-table finish based only on results during the Spaniard’s reign.

 

Comments

  1. The only challenging thing is all this absolute trash articles about the same old shit, if we had FFP issues we wouldn't be offering £20m for Alex Scott now would we...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/