Skip to main content

A question of identity for Athletic Bilbao

For much of their 125-year history, Athletic Bilbao have been recognised for their unique player policy.

Known as a philosophy by those connected to the club, it dictates that Athletic only use players who have been born or brought up in what is defined as the Basque Country, a region of northern Spain and across the border in France of three million inhabitants that shares linguistic, historical and cultural ties.

It has served them well: behind Real Madrid and Barcelona, they are Spain’s third most successful club in terms of trophies won, and remain the only team other than those two never to have played outside the country’s top flight. 

Towards the end of a lengthy general assembly in October, however, a group of socios (club members) asked whether the interpretation of Athletic’s “philosophy” should be extended to allow the children and grandchildren of Basque people living abroad to play for the club.

Those who are in favour of a change point out the Basque Country’s low birth rate compared to the rest of Europe. The Basque Country in Spain had a birth rate of 6.2 (births per 1,000 inhabitants) for 2022 according to the statistics office Eustat, the lowest since 1975, and lower than Spain’s rate of 6.9 and the European Union’s 8.7. 

The official response from Athletic to those who raised the issue at the general assembly was clear. President Jon Uriarte told a press conference afterwards that none of the three candidates who had run for the position last year had campaigned to change the philosophy and that fans who wanted to open a debate could do so through the appropriate mechanisms. Voices from within the club do not think the desire for change is widespread within Athletic’s fanbase.

Even so, some fans think Athletic’s philosophy in its present form is limiting. The question is how many are willing to discuss something which is such a significant part of the club’s identity.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/