In my opinion discussion of Manchester City's conduct has often bordered on the hysterical and it is the financial and economic press (principally the FT and The Economist) that have attended to the geopolitical dimensions that might ultimately be influential. I was therefore interested to read an Op Ed piece by Stephen Bush in the Pink 'Un yesterday. I must admit that I was quite surprised when I saw Bush on Sky's The Wrap the other night - not the fact of his being there but that he seemed to be to the right of the senior political correspondent of the Daily Telegraph. He needs to remember that his paper endorsed Labour in 2024! It has to be noted that in large part the article is a pop at Andy Burnham and makes the arguably valid point that what 'Manchesterism' amounted to was selling the city to global investment capital. Bush argues: 'The fact that Manchester City have been found guilty of 114 of the 115 charges brought against them by the Premier Lea...
UK tax authorities probed Manchester City in 2018 over whether it used complex arrangements to underpay tax, nearly a decade before the club was found to have breached the Premier League’s financial rules, the Financial Times has exclusively revealed. HM Revenue & Customs opened a civil investigation into Man City’s tax affairs in the wake of the publication of a trove of leaked internal emails by Der Spiegel in 2018, according to people with knowledge of the situation. The emails prompted a Premier League investigation, launched in December of that year, into whether the club had manipulated its accounts and disguised funding from owner Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed al-Nahyan, a member of Abu Dhabi’s ruling family, as commercial revenue. Last month, an independent commission found that Man City had artificially inflated its financial position by more than £900mn between 2009 and 2018 by arranging “sham” commercial deals. The club allegedly paid former manager Roberto Mancini thro...