Skip to main content

New tv deal will not bust bank

The new domestic television deal for the Premier League is unlikely to see a big increase in the cost of the contract, but there may be changes in what is offered to viewers.

Far more than half of all Premier League matches could be shown live from 2019. Three options are up for discussion: 190, 200 or 210 of the 380 top flight games played each season. At present 168 games are aired each season, but the league has promised regulator Ofcom that it will make at least 190 available in the next three year deal which will run to 2022. If the maximum option is chosen with 42 additional matches televised that would mean more matches shown midweek and on bank holidays.

The Premier League is considering introducing a prime time late night slot for Premier League matches but will try to protect the practice of not permitting any live broadcasts of 3pm matches on Saturdays. There would also be occasions when two live matches would be screened simultaneously which would dilute the audience.

In 2015 Sky and BT paid a combined £5.1bn, a 67 per cent increase, for the domestic rights with the bulk of the matches going to Sky. There is not expected to be more than a modest increase this time even if a digital giant such as Facebook or Amazon submits a bid. BT is more focused on Champions League coverage, although it would like to have the Saturday night slot.

The big six clubs are sulking after they failed to get a bigger share of overseas television rights and may resist efforts to give broadcasters greater access to players, managers and dressing rooms.

The tender is expected to go out to broadcasters before Christmas with the auction to be completed in February.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/