Skip to main content

Big Six after more overseas tv cash

The 'big six' clubs are going to make a new bid to secure a bigger share of overseas TV rights. In October, Arsenal, Chelsea, Liverpool, Spurs and the two Manchester clubs were defeated in a bid to have 35 per cent of overseas TV money allocated according to league position. If the new system were in operation the title winners would get £53m compared with £25m for the club finishing bottom. Every club finishing below 13th would be worse off.

Now the issue has come up again after the value of the 2019-22 domestic TV rights fell for the first time in 15 years. Chief executive Richard Scudamore wants the matter settled at the annual general meeting in June.

The bigger clubs argue that their matches are the ones that drive the overseas TV sales. The five main domestic packages sold for £4.464 billion, nearly £700m short of the current deal. Across Sky and BT Sport, the cost per match works out at £9.3m for the new deal, compared with £10.19m under the current deal which lasts until 2019.

There were multiple bidders for the remaining two packages, including Amazon, but they failed to reach the reserve price. Each of the packages has 20 matches with some being played simultaneously.

In contrast the overseas rights are projected to grow up by 40 per cent, from £3 billion, over the next three year cycle, taking them close to the value of the domestic deal.

Clubs outside the top six are concerned about the financial gap between them and the leading clubs growing even more if they get a bigger share of TV income. As it is, Manchester United had a wage bill of £264m in 2016-17 compared with £33m at Burnley.

However, the implicit threat is that the big clubs would abandon the collective selling of rights and seek to sell the rights individually, as is commonplace in Europe. This would hit the smaller clubs hard.

Hence, there is a search for a compromise. One idea is a NBA style luxury tax based on the wage bills of clubs. All clubs paying above a certain figure on wages would pay a percentage of their wages into a central pot which would then be redistributed.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/