Skip to main content

Huddersfield debt is the softest a club could get

The authoritative Swiss Ramble has now turned his attention to Huddersfield Town, their 2016/17 accounts relating to the year in which they won promotion. As he now tweets rather than blogs, I follow the practice of consolidating his insights so that they may be more widely shared.

He notes, 'The loss before tax widened from £1.6m to £19.6m, as they paid the price for success with £11.9m of promotion expenses (e.g. bonuses). Post-tax loss was £17.1m, thanks to £2.5m tax credit. Revenue rose £4.5m (40 per cent) to £15.8m, but profit on player sales was down £5.7m to £1.2m.'

The main reason for the club's £4.5m revenue growth was the new Premier League TV deal, which resulted in a higher solidarity payment, thus increasing broadcasting income by £2.6m. Commercial income and match day rose £1.0m and £0.9m respectively.

Their £20m loss was one of the highest in the Championship in 2016/17, though not as big as fellow promoted club Brighton £39m. In general, almost all clubs in this division lose money.

Losses are nothing new for Huddersfield, as the last time they made a profit was way back in 2006 – and that was less than £100k. Since owner Dean Hoyle came on board in April 2008, the club has sustained higher losses, amounting to £57m in nine years.

The £16m revenue was one of the lowest in the Championship in 2016/17, highlighting the immense achievement in securing promotion. For some context, highest revenues to date are Norwich £75m & Aston Villa £74m. Revenue in the Premiership should be above £100m, enabling the club to return to profit.

Championship revenue is greatly influenced by those Premier League parachute payments, e.g. £41m to Aston Villa, Newcastle & Norwich (up from £26m in 15/16 thanks to new Premier League TV deal). Those alone were 2.5 times as much as Huddersfield's total revenue of £16m.

The decision to slash season ticket prices to £179 (around £8 per game), funded by higher TV money, led to a huge increase in average attendance from 12,631 to 20,343. The move to cut ticket prices followed decline in attendance from 15,071 in 12/13 to 12,631 in 15/16. Hoyle said, 'Let’s get the stadium fuller and see where it takes us.' Not only did this fan-friendly move pay off financially, but it must have helped the promotion push.

The 2017/18 shirt sponsor is OPE Sports, a global betting brand, replacing Pure Legal, who have become the club’s first sleeve sponsor. The deal is reportedly worth £1.5m a year.

The wages to turnover ratio of 137 per cent is the 2nd highest reported to date in the Championship, only below Blackburn Rovers 147 per cent, though again is obviously adversely impacted by large promotion bonuses. In any case, half of the clubs in that division have ratios above 100 per cent.

The club only spent £7m on players in 16/17, one of lowest in Championship, though they also made some astute loan signings (Mooy, Ward, Brown & Palmer). They were significantly outspent by clubs like Villa £88m, Wolves £32m, Fulham £24m, Derby £21m, Norwich £20m and Brighton £19m.

Gross debt rose £10m to £53m, almost all owed to owner Dean Hoyle (£52.3m). It is long-term, unsecured, interest-free, with no repayment date, so this is just about the 'softest' debt a club could get. Even after this increase in debt of £50m is by no means the largest in Championship, e.g. the three highest reported to date are Brighton £207m (new stadium & training ground), Cardiff City £127m and Ipswich Town £89m.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...