Skip to main content

Notts County finances seen through a glass darkly

Many League One and League Two clubs prepare their annual accounts, published online at Companies House, using the small companies regime which means that less information is available than for larger clubs. Normally companies are required to comply with Financial Reporting Standard 102, but in extremely rare circumstances they may be permitted not to do so. Notts County have thus departed from the requirement of FRS 102 Section 11 paragraph 11.14(a). This means that we have no income statement for the world's oldest professional football club.

What we do know is that 'The balance sheet shows that liabilities exceed assets by £6,271,609 (2016 - £4,842,818) at the year end. The company has reported a net loss after tax of £1,533,791 (2016 - £1,752,783) for the year and the directors do not expect the company to generate a profit in the coming financial year. The company's forecasts and cashflow projections indicate that future working capital requirements are in excess of the resources currently available to the company.'

'The company is reliant on continued financial support and additional future funding from the ultimate parent company [Paragon Leisure Group Limited] which itself is reliant on continued support from other related parties, in order to continue as a going concern.' In other words, Notts County is a benefactor club, albeit not on the scale of Chelsea, Middlesbrough or Ipswich Town. There is a commercial dimension to this relationship as the club owes Paragon Leisure £4.3m which is charged at an interest rate of four per cent, amounting to £170k a year.

We do know from a statement made by the chairman in January that the club was £250k inside the projected budget, in part because of the FA Cup run (and in particular the televised game against Oxford City). Ticket and hospitality sales also improved as the club challenged for promotion.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Reports about Charlton sale exaggerated

Reports have appeared in The Guardian and elsewhere that Charlton has been put up for sale. Richard Cawley is an authoritative local journalist who runs a South London Sport substack site.  He reached out to the club yesterday evening to ask for comment on The Guardian’s article. Early indications from the club have been that nothing has changed since the story about them seeking investment, except that it is now a different company doing it. Charlton have since managed to consolidate their place in the Championship, avoiding an instant return to League One, with their women’s side promoted to the WSL, returning to the top flight for the first time since 2007, although staying there is likely to be costly. It would be counter-intuitive for owners Global Football Partners not to progress the club when looking for investment, that the focus remains on driving it forward, that their spend this summer is in line with long-term planning and will see an increase in wages spent on players...

Levy's anomalous status at Spurs

It is now nearly a year since Daniel Levy was dismissed as Tottenham Hotspur chairman by the Lewis family.  It has been 12 months of dramatic twists and turns, with Spurs avoiding relegation on the final day of the Premier League season, and then spending unprecedented sums this summer to try to make sure such a scare never happens again. But while most fans focus on the football — and a dubbing by Brentford   — another set of issues have been bubbling away separately. These relate to Levy’s continued position as a minority shareholder in the club. This has been in the news for much of this summer, even as we approach the first anniversary of Levy’s dismissal, and specifically this month, after he missed the opportunity last week to participate in the Lewis family’s latest equity injection into the club. On Thursday morning the club confirmed that his shareholding has been diluted, down by roughly two per cent, after the creation of new ENIC shares. Levy’s dism...