Skip to main content

Boro made a profit in the top flight

The authoritative Swiss Ramble has looked at Middlesbrough's 2016/17 accounts, covering their year in the Premiership. Next season is the last season in which they will receive parachute payments as they were relegated after one season.

Following promotion to Premier League Boro converted a pre-tax of £32.0m loss to £6.9m profit, as revenue increased by £100m to a record £121m and profit on player sales was up £7m to £11m.

The club had the third lowest revenue (£121m) in the Premier League, so from that perspective relegation should not have been a great surprise. They did actually have the highest revenue of the three promoted clubs, ahead of Burnley £121m and Hull City £117m.

2016/17 was first time that Boro had made a profit since 2005, though very nearly broke-even in 2009. Since then, they accumulated £112m of losses in the Championship. They really “went for it” in 2015/16, resulting in a record £32m loss.

TV revenue will fall significantly in 17/18 from £99m to an estimated £45m, despite a £41m parachute payment. However, this was significantly higher than the £8m that most Championship clubs averaged.

Even though a striking 84% of revenue came from TV, this level of dependency is far from unusual in the Premier League. No fewer than five clubs were more reliant on this revenue stream: Bournemouth, Burnley, Watford, WBA and Swansea City.

Gate receipts increased £1.4m (20%) from £7.3m to £8.7m, their highest ever, even though season ticket prices were frozen in 2016/17, as attendances rose by almost a quarter from 24,627 to 30,449.

Following promotion the wage bill more than doubled from £32m to £65m, though it is worth noting that the underlying increase was even higher, as 2015/16 included (estimated) £10m bonus payments. Wages to turnover ratio was cut from 149% to 53%, more or less the level recommended by accountants Deloitte.

Even after the increase in the wage bill to £65m, it was still the third lowest in the Premier League, only ahead of the other promoted clubs (Burnley and Hull City, both £61m). It will reduce in 17/18, due to relegation clauses and departures (player sales and loans ending).

The clubmade £48m player purchases in 16/17 (including de Roon, Traoré, Gestede, Bamford, Guédioura, Barragan and Fabio), which is only £5m more than the previous (big spending) Championship season. The combined £90m in those 2 seasons considerably more than £14m in preceding two seasons.

Gross debt rose £3m from £99m to £102m. Almost all of this (£93.6m) is owed to owner Steve Gibson, while there is also a bank loan of £8.6m. Debt would have been even higher if Gibson had not converted £63m into share capital, highlighting the club’s reliance on the owner.

Boro have no issues with financial fair play, as they have a total allowable loss of £61m over the 3-year monitoring period (£35m for 1 Premier League season plus 2 Championship seasons at £13m). In any case, the Swiss Ramble estimates they will make a small profit in 17/18 thanks to hefty player sales.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/