Skip to main content

In depth look at Sunderland accounts

The authoritative Swiss Ramble has been taking a look at Sunderland's 2016/17 accounts which cover the season when they finished bottom of the Premier League and were relegated to the Championship.

The club significantly reduced loss before tax from £33m to £10m, though influenced by profit on player sales (mainly Jordan Pickford) rising from £5m to £33m. On the other hand, would have been break-even without exceptional £10m that the courts forced them to pay Inter for Ricky Alvarez.

Sunderland were the only club in the Premier League to report a loss in the 2016/17 season. The Swiss Ramble comments, 'This takes some doing in the first year of a spectacular new TV deal.'

Revenue grew £18m (17%) to £126m, entirely due to the new three year Premier League TV deal, which increased broadcasting income by £24m (34%) to £96m. Other revenue streams actually fell: commercial was down £4.3m (16%) to £21.8m, while gate receipts slipped £1.5m (14%) to £9.0m.

Revenue almost doubled from £65m in 2010 to £126m in 2017. However, almost all (£57m) of growth was due to new TV deals (2011, 2014 & 2017). Commercial only rose £8m, while gate receipts actually fell £4m. This is worrying, as these become more important in lower leagues.

£22m commercial income was a respectable 10th highest in Premier League. Shirt sponsor Dafabet increased from £5m to £6m in 2016/17 with the agreement running to 2019, while the long-term kit deal with Adidas, worth a reported £4m a year, runs to 2020.

The last time that the club made a profit was way back in 2006. Since then, they have reported losses for 11 consecutive years, totaling £214m (annual average £19m). No wonder chief executive Martin Bain said that the club has been haemorrhaging money'. In fact, of the 11 clubs that have been in the lucrative Premier League for the last six seasons, Sunderland is the only one that has lost money every year.

TV revenue was over £50m lower in 17/18 at around £44m, despite a £41m parachute payment, though significantly higher than the £8m most Championship clubs averaged. League One will see a further £11m fall to £33m, though this will be a hefty £30m more than other clubs.

The 67% wages to turnover ratio was 2nd highest (worst) in Premier League, only behind Swansea 77%, which included severance payments to two managers. There are some exceptions, but League One essentially restricts clubs to 60% (though includes player sales).

As Short admitted, 'overall, my chairmanship has not gone the way I would have wished.' The Swiss Ramble concludes, 'To be fair, he put in a lot of cash, but his appointments left a lot to be desired. The last two seasons have been disastrous, but there is hope with a new owner and the debts paid off.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/