Skip to main content

Bournemouth's revenue 28th highest in world

The authoritative Swiss Ramble takes a look at Bournemouth's 2016/17 accounts. These covered a season when they finished in a record high position of 9th in the Premier League, securing a 3rd consecutive season in the top flight.

The club more than quadrupled profit before tax from £3.4m to £14.7m, as revenue rose £49m (55%) to a record £136m, though they made a £1m loss on player sales compared to an £11m gain the previous season. After tax, the club made a £14.0m profit.

Profit before tax of £15m is obviously a fine achievement, but to place it in perspective it is only the 13th highest in the Premier League. In fact, 18 of 19 clubs that have published 2016/17 accounts to date have reported profits, mainly thanks to spectacular TV money. An astonishing 91% of revenue comes from TV (£125m out of £136m), which is the biggest dependency in the top flight, though it should be noted that 12 of the 19 clubs that have reported to date are above 75%.

Since promotion to the Premier League in 2015, Bournemouth have been profitable. Before that they reported four consecutive years of losses, totaling £69m, including a staggering £39m deficit in the 2014/15 promotion season.

The £49m revenue growth was almost entirely due to new three year Premier League TV deal, which increased broadcasting income by £49m (66%) to £125m. However, the other revenue streams both fell: commercial was down £0.5m (7%) to £6.8m, while match day slipped £0.2m (4%) to £5.2m.

This is the lowest in the Premier League, just behind Burnley. For some perspective, Manchester United and Arsenal earn more from this revenue stream in two games than Bournemouth do in an entire season. The club has acquired a site for a new stadium with the aim of this being built for the start of the 2020/21 season.

The £7m commercial income is second lowest in the Premier League, only above Watford £6m. 2017/18 will benefit from new deals: shirt sponsor M88 ('biggest in the Cherries’ history'); first sleeve sponsor Mansion; kit supplier Umbro.

Nevertheless, Bournemouth had the 13th highest revenue (£136m) in the Premier League, sandwiched between WBA £138m and Stoke City £136m. However, they were around £35m behind Everton and nearly £50m lower than West Ham and Southampton. In fact £136m was the 28th highest in the world, according to the Deloitte Money League, only £12m less than Champions League semi-finalists AS Roma, but ahead of clubs like Benfica, Ajax, Sevilla, Lazio, Celtic and Europa League finalists Marseille.

The club experienced significant cost growth. The wage bill rose £12m (20%) from £60m to £72m, which would have been around £78m on a 12-month basis. Wages to turnover ratio was cut from 68% to 52%. The wage bill was the fourth lowest in the Premier League.

In the six seasons since Demin arrived, Bournemouth's main source of funds has been £74m from owners (£53m loans and £21m preference shares), though club now generating cash in the Premier League. Two-thirds (£53m) spent on players with £12m on infrastructure.

Gross debt was around the same at £53m, but net debt doubled from £20m to £40m, as cash fell from £34m to £13m. Debt is all owed to club’s owners: (a) Russian Maxim Demin’s company AFCB Enterprises Ltd £33m; (b) 25% minority owner, Peak6 Holdings, a US private equity firm £20m. The £53m gross debt is by no means the largest in the Premier League, but it has increased by almost 600% in five years.

The loans provide by #AFCB owners are interest-free (with no fixed repayment date), which gives them a competitive advantage against those clubs who have to pay largish amounts of interest, e.g. West Ham £5m, Hull City £4m and Watford £4m.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/