Skip to main content

Premier League clubs rein in transfer deals

This week Fifa released figures on the amount clubs spent in the 2018 transfer window: Big 5 leagues spending

The numbers show that clubs in the Premier League spent $1.44bn on transfer fees, a slight decrease from last year's figure of $1.46bn. This is the first fall in the summer window when most of the spending takes place. The winter window often involves discarding disgruntled or failing players and some panic buying by under performing clubs.

In contrast, clubs in Germany, Italy and Spain increased their spending. English side recouped almost $560m in player sales, more than in any other season since the start of the decade.

The shorter transfer window and the absence of many players at the World Cup affected the time available to do deals. The fall in the value of the pound against the dollar and the euro also affected the spending power of English clubs, although some of them have income in euros from European competitions.

However, there may have also been a Brexit effect on decisions by clubs. Just as in other sectors of the economy, uncertainty about the outcome has deterred investment. The effect is probably less than in some sectors, however, as football clubs have a much more short-term horizon than other businesses. Players are needed in the current season to achieve targets such as Champions League qualification.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/