Parachute payments make life difficult for Bristol City

Bristol City are yet another Championship club hit by the skewed playing field caused by parachute payments concludes the authoritative Swiss Ramble in a review of their recently published accounts.

The Swiss Ramble notes, 'Despite the growth in revenue, Bristol City's £26m revenue is still only mid-table in the Championship. For some context, in 2016/17 Newcastle led the way with £86m, a full £60m more. So far in 2017/18, Norwich City and Hull City have posted £62m and £56m (with Sunderland and Boro to come). It’s difficult to compete with clubs receiving Premier League parachute payments with no fewer than eight clubs benefiting from these in 2017/18.'

'If parachute payments were to be excluded, it would be a very different story. In this case, Bristol City would have the seventh highest revenue in the Championship, which would give them a very decent chance of making the play-offs.'

'Almost all clubs lose money in the Championship, but their £25m loss would have been among the highest in 2016/17, only behind Newcastle United £47m and Brighton and Hove Albion £39m (both adversely impacted by promotion bonuses and exceptional payments).'

All revenue streams were up: commercial by £2.2m (23%) to £11.6m; match day by £1.6m (32%) to £6.6m; and broadcasting by £0.9m (13%) to £7.7m.

'Player sales dried up in 2017/18 with their tiny £0.3m profit unsurprisingly being one of the lowest in the Championship. This is in stark contrast to Norwich City, whose bottom line last season was greatly boosted by £48m from this activity.'

The club have rarely made big money from selling players. In fact, the £14m profit in 2016/17 (largely sale of Jonathan Kodija to Aston Villa) is around two-thirds of the £20m generated in last ten years from this activity. However, this season will include £23m sales of Bobby Reid, Aden Flint and Joe Bryan (cash income £13m).

'Attendances have significantly increased since promotion from League One, rising 80% from 11,681 to 20,953. The redevelopment of the Ashton Gate stadium (capacity 27,000), shared with Bristol rugby club and also used for major concerts, has helped generate revenue.' Even so, 'average attendance of 20.953 was only the 12th highest in the Championship, over 10,000 less than Aston Villa and Leeds United. However, the club has announced a record number of season ticket sales for 2018/19, despite controversy over the pricing scheme.

'The wages to turnover ratio worsened from 98% to 105% [the recommended level is 50 per cent], but still much better than 170% in the 2012/13 Championship season.' More than half the Championship clubs have ratios of over 100 per cent as they compete for the riches of the Premier League.'

'The gross debt of £72m is quite large for a club of their size, but many other clubs in the Championship have larger debts. The debt is not an issue, so long as Steve Lansdown remains a friendly owner, as he demonstrated when converting £37m of debt to equity in 2013.' The Swiss Ramble comments, 'I estimate that he has put in around £134m to date (capital £114m, loan £20m) with little sign of the need for this funding going away. Bristol City are fortunate to have a benevolent owner in Steve Lansdown, but this is in reality a necessity for those Championship clubs that are not in receipt of sizeable parachute payments, if they wish to compete.

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month. He was approaching ninety, but still went to games. Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules. Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000. The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts. Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved: https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen. There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere: https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/

The Political Economy of Football V2

Search This Blog