Skip to main content

Swiss verdict is that Hearts are on the right track

The authoritative Swiss Ramble has taken an in depth look at the recently published accounts of Hearts. Here are some of the highlights from his comments.

The last loss Hearts reported was £0.9m in 2014/15, when they won the Scottish Championship. Since promotion, they have been profitable three seasons in a row.

Hearts £12m revenue is the fourth highest in Scotland, within striking distance of Aberdeen £15m, but only around a third of Rangers £33m, while Celtic’s £102m is miles ahead. Indeed the revenue gap between Hearts and the big two Glasgow clubs is now at its highest for a while: £89m to Celtic and £20m to Rangers. On the other hand, they are £2.7m higher than Edinburgh rivals Hibernian.

Given Hearts stadium investment, they did well to deliver the second largest profit in the SPFL Premiership with their £1.8m only beaten by Celtic £15.4m. That said, eight of the 12 clubs in the Scottish top flight make money with only Rangers reporting a sizeable £14.3m loss. One reason Celtic’s profit was so large was £16.5m profit on player sales (mainly Virgil Van Dijk sell-on fee and Stuart Armstrong to Southampton). In contrast, Hearts only made £0.4m from this activity (largely Jamie Walker to Wigan and Isma to Pakhtakor).

SPFL chief executive Neil Doncaster described the latest domestic TV deal as 'the highest prize fund in the history of the Scottish game', but Hearts 6th place in the league was only worth £1.5m. For perspective, English Championship clubs get almost 5 times as much (£7m).

As is the case for most Scottish clubs, Hearts are mainly reliant on match day income, though this has fallen as a proportion of total revenues from 59% in 2013 to 43% in 2018. Over the same period, commercial has more than doubled from 16% to 35%, while broadcasting is 20%. Hearts gate receipts rose £1.0m (24%) to £5.3m, as capacity increased after completion of main stand saw average attendance rise from 16,338 to 18,163 (including four matches at Murrayfield). Third highest income in Scotland, but Celtic £32m and Rangers £23m far higher.

Hearts stadium development will cost £18m and should be completed during 2019/20 season. This will deliver increased capacity to 20,000 and improved other facilities (hybrid pitch, undersoil heating and supporters bar). Owner Ann Budge says that it should generate an additional £3m each season.

Hearts average attendance of 18,163 is around 40,000 lower than Celtic and 30,000 less than Rangers, but just ahead of Hibernian 17,964 and Aberdeen 15,633.

Hearts commercial income rose by £0.2m (4%) to £4.3m, comprising commercial £2.9m, sponsorship and advertising £0.8m and other income £0.7m. Close to Aberdeen £6.4m and Rangers £5.3m, but long way below Celtic £37m.

Hearts wages to turnover ratio increased from 51% to 57%, though this is still pretty good [the recommended level is 50 per cent] and about the same as Celtic 58% and Hibernian 56%.

Although Hearts said “the last two transfer windows have seen the club make significant signings”, they only had £0.3m player purchases in 17/18, which was actually lower than £0.5m in 16/17. The only clubs that spent big money last season were Celtic £17m and Rangers £10m. In fact, Hearts have only spent a total of £1.5m on bringing in new players over the last 9 years (though £1.0m of that was in the last 3 years). In the same period, they have had player sales of £5.8m, leading to £4.3m net sales.

The Swiss Ramble concludes, 'Hearts have come a long way since the club was placed into administration in 2013, deducted 15 points and then relegated to the Scottish Championship. Much of the credit is due to Ann Budge, who took ownership in June 2014, following the misguided Romanov regime. Budge noted, 'As a business we are in good shape: growing revenues and managing costs. The future looks bright indeed.' Of course, it is difficult for any Scottish club to compete financially with Celtic and Rangers, but Hearts are at least on the right track.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...

A poor financial record, but new hope at Everton

I recently saw an amusing video online in which a group of Everton fans were rebuked in jest for being hopeful.  Football fans in general tend to swing between excessive optimism and excessive pessimism, but for many it seems that moaning is in their bloodstream (Spurs fans probably take the trophy).  However, Everton fans have had plenty to moan about on and off the pitch.   Let’s hope that a new era is about to begin for this grand old club. Everton’s 2023/24 financial results covered a fairly momentous season, when they ended up 15th in the Premier League, though they would finished three places higher if they had not received an 8-point deduction for breaching the Premier League’s Profitability and Sustainability Regulations (PSR). It was a worrying time for Everton fans, as the club faced a “perfect storm” of issues, including large financial losses, an ever increasing debt burden, a challenging stadium build and the tortuous sale of the club. There were eve...