Skip to main content

Record profit at Arsenal

Arsenal's 2017/18 accounts show profit before tax increased from £45m to £70m, despite revenue falling £35m (8%) to £388m, mainly due to participating in the Europa League rather than more lucrative Champions League, as profit on player sales surged £113m to £120m. Profit after tax improved from £35m to £57m.

£70m profit before tax is not only a record for the club, but is the highest profit reported to date in the 2017/18 Premier League, just ahead of Chelsea £67m, followed by Manchester United £26m and West Ham £18m. In fact it is the third highest profit ever registered in the Premier League. Judging by vox pop comments by Arsenal fans before last night's cup game, many of them would like to see some of this profit invested in the team.

The last time Arsenal made a loss was in 2002, so they have recorded profits for 16 years in succession. Even so, the authoritative Swiss Ramble notes, 'However, 2018/19 is likely to see a large loss, due to lack of Champions League and no major player sales.'

The £120m profit on player sales is actually the highest ever made by an English club. Excluding players sales and property development, there would have been a £55m loss.

All the club's revenue streams decreased: broadcasting was £19m (9%) lower at £180m, mainly due to lower Europa League distributions; commercial dropped £10m (9%) to £107m; match day declined by 1 per cent to £99m. Commercial revenue fell largely because of penalty clauses in sponsorship deals for not being in the Champions League. Since 2015 the club's commercial income has basically been flat (only up £4m), while this important revenue stream has grown significantly at the other leading clubs. The club will have improved commercial deals from 2019/20: extension of Emirates sponsorship at £40m (up £10m) and Adidas kit supplier (reported £60m vs. Puma £30m).

The importance of match day revenue to Arsenal is very clear, as shown by 25% of their total revenue coming from this category. This is much higher than any other leading club.

Tottenham Hotspur are now only £9m behind Arsenal in terms of revenue, as their revenue increased £73m in 2017/18 to £379m, while Arsenal declined £35m to £388m, producing a net swing of £108m. The gap was as much as £141m just two seasons ago.

The wage bill increased by 12 per cent to £223m. There were also £17m exceptional leaving payments to Wenger and his support team. This increased (worsened) the wages to turnover ratio from 47% to 58%, though not as high as 64% in 2013.

The property next to Holloway Road was sold, contributing net £5m, meaning the Hornsey Road site is the only remaining development. In addition, net interest payable was £6m lower, mainly due to an interest-rate swap.

The Swiss Ramble states, 'While this is a very good set of financials, Arsenal do face some challenges. The self-sustaining model is very dependent on Champions League qualification – or profitable player sales. Without these, the wage bill will come under pressure, making it more difficult to compete.'

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/