Skip to main content

Billionaire interested in buying Chelesa

Sir Jim Ratcliffe, the wealthiest person in Britain, has renewed his interest in buying Chelsea after he was rebuffed last summer. Officially, the club is not for sale. Ratcliffe, who is a tax exile living in Monaco, is expected to complete his takeover of the Team Sky cycling outfit later today.

Roman Abramovich has been conspicuous by his absence from Chelsea since his dispute with the British authorities over the renewal of his visa, although his Israeli passport would allow him to spend six months in the UK.

Exploratory talks are believed to have taken place, but the two sides are far apart in their valuation. Ratcliffe has balked at the £2.5 billion figure Abramovich has in mind given that the club needs a new stadium, a project abandoned by Abramovich, which would cost at least £1 billion.

What a football club is worth is ultimately how much a purchaser with the necessary funds is prepared to pay for it, just as with a house. Forbes magazine valued Chelsea at £1.44 billion last year with KPMG arriving at a figure at £1.26 billion. Abramovich would want to see a return on the £1.17 billion in loans he has provided to the club since buying it for £140m in 2003.

Comments

  1. If Abrahamovich isn't keen to run the affairs of the club, then he should by all means sell

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/