Fosun's gamble paid off for Wolves

The authoritative Swiss Ramble has taken an in depth look at the 2017/18 accounts of Wolverhampton Wanderers. the club'sloss shot up from £23m to a breathtaking £57m, largely due to increased expenditure on players and wages plus an estimated £20m on bonuses and additional transfer fee payments following promotion. The £57m loss is the highest ever reported in the Championship, unless one excludes the £60m boost to QPR 2013/14 accounts for the write-off of a shareholder loan (challenged by the EFL for FFP purposes), which would mean their loss would have been higher at £70m.

Under former owner Steve Morgan Wolves were very prudent, making profits six times in seven years. Fosun have a very different strategy, namely 'strong investment into the squad', leading to £70m combined losses in the last two years – but the gamble paid-off with promotion.

TV income was unchanged at £8.0m, including PL solidarity payment £4.5m and £2.3m EFL central distribution. The huge amounts received in the top flight (£150m for 1st place, £95m for 20th) help explain why Wolves 'went for it' in pursuit of that prize. 7th place would give them £128m.

Revenue rose 11% (£2.6m) from £23.8m to £26.4m, as commercial increased £1.4m (15%) to £10.6m and gate receipts were up £1.3m (20%) to £7.8m, but broadcasting was flat at £8.0m. Profit on player sales was £5.9m higher at £8.1m.

Wolves can anticipate revenue of around £145m this season with the new TV deal. There is a balanced revenue mix: commercial 40%, broadcasting 30% and match day 30%.

Commercial income will increase in 2018/19 via a raft of new deals: shirt sponsor W88 ('the largest in the club’s history'), kit supplier Adidas and sleeve sponsor CoinDeal, while the owners, Fosun International, will sponsor the training ground.

Last season’s average attendance of 28,298 was almost as high as the Premier League peak of 28,366 in 2009/10, which is a real change in fortune after the steady decline under the previous ownership.

The wage bill surged 80% (£23m) from £28m to £51m, though this included promotion bonuses and 'settlement costs of the outgoing management team'. This means that wages have nearly tripled since Fosun’s arrival. It is actually £12m more than the last time in the Premier League.

Wolves splashed out £25m on players in 2017/18, including Ruben Neves, Roderick Miranda, Rafael Mir and Barry Douglas. This was the second highest in the Championship, though massively outspent by Boro £66m and was also less than their previous season’s £32m spend. Gross transfer spend has tripled since Fosun’s takeover, and is actually more than they spent when they were last in the top flight. The accounts note that they have since spent an amazing £110m this season, including Castro, Traoré, Patricio, Jota, Boly, Afobe and Moutinho.

The Swiss Ramble observes, 'There is no doubt that Fosun have transformed Wolves. They took big financial risks, but would argue that the ends justify the means, as their prospects look very good in the Premier League. Whether this strategy is the right one for other Championship clubs is more debatable.'

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...

A poor financial record, but new hope at Everton

I recently saw an amusing video online in which a group of Everton fans were rebuked in jest for being hopeful. Football fans in general tend to swing between excessive optimism and excessive pessimism, but for many it seems that moaning is in their bloodstream (Spurs fans probably take the trophy). However, Everton fans have had plenty to moan about on and off the pitch. Let’s hope that a new era is about to begin for this grand old club. Everton’s 2023/24 financial results covered a fairly momentous season, when they ended up 15th in the Premier League, though they would finished three places higher if they had not received an 8-point deduction for breaching the Premier League’s Profitability and Sustainability Regulations (PSR). It was a worrying time for Everton fans, as the club faced a “perfect storm” of issues, including large financial losses, an ever increasing debt burden, a challenging stadium build and the tortuous sale of the club. There were eve...

The Political Economy of Football V2

Search This Blog