Skip to main content

Villa lose £370m in a decade

The authoritative Swiss Ramble has provided an analysis of the recently published accounts of Aston Villa. Losses increased by £21m from £15m to £36m, as revenue dropped £5m (7%) from £74m to £69m and profit on player sales fell £11m from £27m to £16m. On the other hand, the club received £3m compensation for HS2 rail project, which will go through part of the training ground.

The £5m revenue fall was mainly due to a £7m lower parachute payment, which meant broadcasting was £7.7m (16%) lower at £40.3m. This was offset by increases in gate receipts, up £1.1m (10%) to £11.8m; commercial, up £0.3m (2%) to £13.4m; and player loans, up £1.1m to £3.0m.

Revenue has fallen £48m (41%) from the £117m peak in the 13/14 Premier League to £69m. It is worth noting the importance of parachute payments, down from £41m to £34m, though still half of total revenue in 17/18. These will further fall this season to £17m, then stop in 19/20. Despite the decrease, Villa's £69m revenue is the highest in the Championship, ahead of Boro £62m and Norwich City, though may be overtaken by Sunderland when they publish their 2017/18 accounts.

Almost all Championship clubs lose money, but Villa's £36m loss is one of the largest of those that have reported to date in 2017/18, around the same level as Birmingham City £37m and QPR £38m.

Villa have consistently lost money with £370m total losses posted in the last 10 years. Incredibly, last season’s £36m loss is only the 5th largest in this period. As former Finance Director Mark Ansell said, 'Villa have gone to the casino, rolled the dice and it hasn’t worked.'

Profit on player sales fell from £27m to £16m, including Amavi, Veretout, Baker, Sanchez and Bacuna. This is still pretty good, but a fair bit lower than the large profits clubs recently relegated from the Premier League made from this activity, e.g., Norwich City £48m.

Villa have increasingly relied on player sales in the last three seasons, averaging £26m annual profit, compared to just £1m in the previous three seasons. Excluding player sales, the 17/18 loss would have been even higher at £52m. Will be much lower in 18/19 (Gollini, Gil and Traoré sell-on).

Villa have booked £109m of exceptional expenses since 2011: £23m to sacked managers (many years), £41m reducing the value of poor player purchases and £45m writing-down the value of Villa Park (2016).

Gate receipts rose 10% (£1.1m) from £10.7m to £11.8m, thanks to reaching the play-offs and staging 3 more domestic Cup games. This is the highest in the Championship, around 20% more than the closest challengers such as Norwich City and Sheffield Wednesday. Average attendances have held up quite well in the Championship, falling just 5% from 33,690 to 32,097. Villa’s crowds have been steadily declining, down 20% (8,000) from the recent high of 40,000 in 2008, but they are nearly 10% higher this season at around 35,000.

Commercial revenue should increase in 2018/19 with new deals: 32Red will be the new shirt sponsor, replacing Unibet, whose logo will feature on training wear; while Under Armour will be replaced as kit supplier by a partnership between Fanatics and Luke 1977.

The wage bill rose by £12m (19%) from £61m to £73m, due to the arrival of John Terry and numerous expensive loans, with players, managers and coaches increasing from 175 to 184. As a consequence, wages to turnover ratio worsened from 83% to 107%. This well above the UEFA recommended level of 70%, but is not unusual in the Championship. Half the clubs have a ratio over 100%. Even so, the £73m wage bill is by far the highest in the Championship, around 50% more than the next highest, even though two of those (Wolves £51m and Cardiff City £48m) included substantial promotion bonuses.

Gross debt has been slashed from £50m to just £6m, as the new owners repaid £48m of old loans, leaving £1m loan notes plus £5m other loans. Debt has greatly reduced from £190m high in 2013 following £90m loan waiver and £89m conversion into equity.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/