New financial highs at Burnley

The authoritative Swiss Ramble has analysed the latest financial results for Burnley. He comments, 'Profit before tax improved by £18m from £27m to £45m, as revenue rose £18m (15%) from £121m to £139m and profit on player sales was up £29m to £31m. After tax, profit increased from £22m to £37m. The club set new record highs for both revenue and profit. Only Spurs, Liverpool, Arsenal and Chelsea had bigger profits, all driven by player sales.'

Burnley have made good profits each time they have been in the Premier League with last season’s £45m even better than £35m in 2014/15. They kept losses low in the Championship and even delivered a small profit in 2012. In the last four years, they have £102m cumulative profits.

The £18m revenue growth was very largely driven by broadcasting’s £17m (16%) increase from £105m to £122m, largely due to increased prize money for finishing 7th, while commercial also increased £1.5m (15%). TV money from the Premier League increased £19m from £101m to £120m, due to a higher merit payment from finishing 7th instead of prior season’s 16th. However, they were adversely impacted by only being shown live 10 times, the contractual minimum (facility fees).

The £139m revenue is very nearly £100m higher than the £40m they generated in the Championship two years ago. The vast majority of this growth (£92m) came from TV, which now accounts for 87% of total revenue (the third highest dependency in the top flight), though commercial grew by £6m (doubled). However, the gap to the Big Six is enormous, as they are £240m below Spurs £381m.

Match day revenue slightly fell by £0.2m (4%) to £5.6m, as they had two fewer home games. This is the third lowest in the Premier League. For some context, Manchester United and Arsenal earn more from this revenue stream in two games than Burnley do in an entire season. Average attendance rose slightly from 20,558 to 20,688, which represents an increase of almost 4,000 compared to season 2015/16 in the Championship, but is the fourth lowest in the Premier League. These are the highest crowds of any Premier League season, just ahead of 20,654 in 2009/10.

The wage bill increased by a third (£20m) from £61m to £82m, mainly due to bonus payments for the high league finish. Since promotion, it has tripled from £27m in the Championship (and up from £29m in 2014/15 PL). It is the third lowest in the Premier League and will probably fall in 2018/19 due to lower performance bonuses. The wages to turnover ratio increased from 51% to 59%, which is still perfectly respectable.

Burnley have recently made more money from player sales: annual average increasing to £15m in last 3 years against £3m in previous seven years. Player purchases totalled £44m. the lowest in the Premier League to date.

If the club do end up being relegated this season (I think they will stay up), the financial blow would be cushioned by £91m of parachute payments (year 1 – £42m, year 2 – £34m, year 3 – £15m).

The Clarets are essentially debt-free (except for £77k of finance leases), having used money from previous period in Premier League to repay directors’ loans and external loans. In fact, the club has £34m net funds, which is testament to their sound financial management. They are in the best debt situation of all Premier League Clubs.

The Swiss Ramble concludes, 'Burnley have done well to survive (and be competitive) in the Premier League, while still maintaining a sustainable model, despite their financial challenges.'

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...

A poor financial record, but new hope at Everton

I recently saw an amusing video online in which a group of Everton fans were rebuked in jest for being hopeful. Football fans in general tend to swing between excessive optimism and excessive pessimism, but for many it seems that moaning is in their bloodstream (Spurs fans probably take the trophy). However, Everton fans have had plenty to moan about on and off the pitch. Let’s hope that a new era is about to begin for this grand old club. Everton’s 2023/24 financial results covered a fairly momentous season, when they ended up 15th in the Premier League, though they would finished three places higher if they had not received an 8-point deduction for breaching the Premier League’s Profitability and Sustainability Regulations (PSR). It was a worrying time for Everton fans, as the club faced a “perfect storm” of issues, including large financial losses, an ever increasing debt burden, a challenging stadium build and the tortuous sale of the club. There were eve...

The Political Economy of Football V2

Search This Blog