Skip to main content

Palace loss highest in Premier League

The authoritative Swiss Ramble takes an in depth look at the finances of Crystal Palace.

The club posted a £35.5m loss before tax, compared to an £11.8m profit the prior year, mainly due to profit on player sales falling £32m to just £2m, though revenue grew £7.6m (5%) from £142.7m to a club record £150.3m. Loss after tax was £33.4m, thanks to a £2.1m tax credit.

The £8m revenue growth was very largely driven by broadcasting’s £4m (4%) increase from £117m to £121m, mainly due to increased prize money for finishing 11th, while commercial also increased £3.1m (21%) from £15.2m to £18.3m and match day was up £0.3m (2%) to £10.9m. Revenue has grown £48m (48%) from £102m to £150m in the last two years. Most of this growth (£43m) was due to new Premier League TV deal in 2017, but commercial is also up £6m (54%), while gate receipts dropped £1m (9%).

A chunky 81% of Crystal Palace revenue came from TV (£121m out of £150m), though in fairness it should be noted that no fewer than 12 of the 20 Premier League clubs get more than 75% of their income from this source, with Bournemouth 'leading the way' with an amazing 89%.

The £36m pre-tax loss is the highest reported to date in the Premier League (only Newcastle United missing). The Eagles are not alone, as six other clubs lost money, including Watford £32m and Stoke £30m, but others were very profitable, e.g. Spurs £139m.

The main driver for the loss is clear, as they only made £2m profit on player sales 'to protect the quality of the playing squad' against £35m prior year (mainly Bolasie to Everton). This was second lowest in the Premier League.

Palace have now lost money in two out of the last three seasons, though their profits in the five years since promotion to the Premier League in 2013 add up to a healthy £36m, averaging £7m a season.

The Selhurst Park stadium project is expected to cost £100m with work beginning at the end of this season, ready for 2021/22. The club say it 'will offer a step change in revenue potential with over 8,300 new seats, up to 3,000 new premium covers and major opportunities for non-matchday revenue.'

The wage bill increased £6m (5%) to £117m, which the club attributed to 'change of first team management', i.e. Frank De Boer. They added, 'Outside of this, costs remained largely flat', though wages have shot up £37m (46%) in last two years. They were as low as £46m in 2014. The £117m wage bill remains the ninth highest in the Premier League, only surpassed by the 'Big Six', Everton and Leicester. The Swiss Ramble comments, 'This raises obvious questions around wage control, despite the club talking about "a lean and efficient approach to its operations."'

The wages to turnover ratio was unchanged at 78%, which is the highest (worst) in the Premier League for the second year in a row, just ahead of Everton 77%. It is literally twice as much as Spurs 39%, though in fairness eight clubs have ratios above the recommended 70% upper limit.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/