Skip to main content

Questions over Bolton deal

A deal has been agreed for the sale of Bolton Wanderers to Laurence Bassini, the former Watford owner. Bassini has to pass the EFL owners' test and provide proof of funding. His three year ban from football for three years from 2013 for breaking transfer rules will not affect the test's outcome.

The club said that 'significant funds' would be made available to pay staff and player wages before the deal was ratified with all debts to HMRC to be settled once it was completed.

One fan commented on Twitter, 'How can a bloke (former bankrupt) who still owes over £1 million to another football club pass the fit and proper person test?' Another commented, 'I find it somewhat amusing that, as a Chartered Accountant, I’m held to a higher standard to be a member of Pompey’s Heritage and Advisory Board than Bassini is to be an owner.'

The principal mechanism to check on the suitability of a prospective owner is the owners’ and directors’ test, formerly known as the ‘fit and proper persons’ test. Strictly speaking, this is a Football Association test administered by the EFL. The objective of this test ‘is to protect the image and integrity of The League and its competitions, the well-being of the Clubs, and the interests of all of the stakeholders in those Clubs, by preventing anyone who is subject to a “Disqualifying Condition” being involved in or influencing the management or administration of a Club.’

So what counts as a ‘disqualifying condition’? The matters covered include the long-standing one of being involved in another club; being disqualified by a sports governing body or professional body; having an unspent conviction for a series of offences (including their equivalent abroad); and company disqualification. In principle, this should exclude anyone as an owner or director who might be regarded as ‘dodgy’.

However, there are important limitations to these rules, as is shown by recent events at Bolton. Departing owner Ken Anderson, who took over at Bolton in 2016, was previously disqualified from being a director for eight years. Anderson, who bought Bolton for £1, was disqualified from being a company director in 2005 for transgressions relating to eight companies including diverting or seeking to divert company funds into a personal account, VAT discrepancies and failing to cooperate with receivers.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...
Post a Comment
Read more

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...
1 comment
Read more

A poor financial record, but new hope at Everton

I recently saw an amusing video online in which a group of Everton fans were rebuked in jest for being hopeful.  Football fans in general tend to swing between excessive optimism and excessive pessimism, but for many it seems that moaning is in their bloodstream (Spurs fans probably take the trophy).  However, Everton fans have had plenty to moan about on and off the pitch.   Let’s hope that a new era is about to begin for this grand old club. Everton’s 2023/24 financial results covered a fairly momentous season, when they ended up 15th in the Premier League, though they would finished three places higher if they had not received an 8-point deduction for breaching the Premier League’s Profitability and Sustainability Regulations (PSR). It was a worrying time for Everton fans, as the club faced a “perfect storm” of issues, including large financial losses, an ever increasing debt burden, a challenging stadium build and the tortuous sale of the club. There were eve...
Post a Comment
Read more